Posts: 4,340
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
179
(09-26-2022, 04:57 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: The clearest example I've seen of this type of thinking came a few years ago, maybe a decade ago, during some climate testimony in the US congress. One person who was called to testify was a theology/english literacy professor.
They argued that climate change isn't a big risk and that humans aren't causing it. They explained that this narrative was more compelling and positive, therefore it was the right one. For a lot of people (I suspect, the majority) facts and evidence aren't relevant, the question of "what evidence is there" doesn't really make sense. What *is* relevant is what is a compelling story and narrative. If you ask "what evidence" they reply with emotional explanations of why they prefer it to be true, because that's how they interpret the world. The "evidence" is their preference.
I wonder what a right winger would think of that person. Are they a useless parasite because they’re an English professor, or one of the good and great because they’re pointing out the truth that climate change is no biggie?
[probably clear to regular readers here, but just to be unambiguous: I disagree with both alternatives]
Posts: 10,286
Threads: 65
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
297
(09-25-2022, 07:18 PM)Bytor Wrote: Debbie Chapman trying to convince us that the economic law of supply and demand somehow doesn't apply to housing.
https://www.tiktok.com/@bytor1970/video/...8278816006
https://twitter.com/Bytor/status/1574172976110501889
An excellent explanation!
Posts: 188
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2020
Reputation:
8
(09-25-2022, 05:48 PM)robson ward 9 Wrote: I was a disgrace that evening. A little background, earlier that morning I learned that a friend from the golf industry had passed away in a motorcycle accident on Tuesday evening. I wasn't my best and was disrespectful to the church and organizers. I am sorry for this.
Talk soon. RIP Jolley.
Oh my gosh... I knew Brian (worked with him for 2 summers) and I didn't hear about this until right now. Very sad. Deepest condolences to any of his family and friends.
Posts: 10,286
Threads: 65
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
297
(09-25-2022, 02:18 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Ward 3 probably has a higher percentage of renters, but Ward 9 is still well over 50% of renters. And many of the remaining are condo owners. Single family home owners actually make up a minority of the population living in the ward. I wonder if they are even the majority of Chapman voters, I don't know. But they are certainly the ones whose values align most closely with Chapman.
Trying to convince a NIMBY to agree with us is extremely difficult and takes time and effort. Convincing someone who already agrees with you that it's worth coming out to vote is much easier. All it requires is sounding like you actually are on their side and can make a difference--which given Chapmans voting record against housing, isn't difficult at all.
Given the voter turnout for municipal elections is generally in the 30% range, there's plenty of non-voters out there to convert into voters. And of course, given that older, white, wealthy, single family homeowners who support Chapman are more likely to vote, that number is even higher among renters and younger condo owners.
I'm sure there are many homeowners that would be receptive to BrooklinWR's values but they are sparse and intermixed with a much larger number of likely Chapman supporters. The biggest advantage I see that BrooklinWR could exploit is the relative density of potential supporters in rental and condo buildings.
The highlighted part was exactly my point -- thanks, Dan.
Posts: 58
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
0
Kae Elgie from the uptown neighbourhood associations says that only 30 people have registered for her Sept 29 debate (Regional Councillor seats for Waterloo), and was hoping that I could help promote. If you know of people uptown who would benefit from a little election education (and are okay with attending public events) then please help spread the word: https://Waterloo_Regional_Council_debate.eventbrite.ca
Posts: 1,477
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
41
I have been part of three successful municipal campaigns, once for a new candidate, and then twice more for their re-election. I walked many streets and knocked on lots of doors. I had a full range of conversations with electors from the polite, the angry, the interested and the disinterested.
Quick tips on how to run a municipal campaign:
1. Identify some core policies that you are passionate about that are also broader than single-issue issues. "I can do better" doesn't cut it, nor does "Put a new playground in X park" while ignoring a wider park strategy. If you win, you'll need to be prepared to handle a lot of complicated issues.
2. Make yourself familiar with what your jurisdiction of choice (eg City, Region, School Board) did or didn't do before this campaign. Are you revisiting something that has already been settled?
3. Make yourself familiar with what your jurisdiction is responsible for. This includes knowing what is City, Region, School Board, Province or Federal responsibility. If a voter asks about an issue that isn't the responsibility of your position of choice, the best answer is, "Well, if I win, I will work with C/R/SB/P/F to make our position known on the matter that is ultimately their responsibility to fund and manage."
4. Plan to canvas your entire ward/electoral area at least once during the campaign period with a door knocking campaign that (hopefully) includes the candidate somewhere on the street should a particular address need the candidate to answer a harder question.
5. Don't forget multi-residential buildings where the property manager is obligated to allow entry during election campaigns.
6. Identify those voting areas that have a higher turnout and target them for an extra door knocking run or two. Also consider sending flyers to areas that you can't get to more than once. While it would be great to inspire turnout from new voters, the reality is that there are some neighbourhoods where voting for your particular position of choice isn't a priority (eg a neighbourhood of university students is not likely interested in voting for a school board candidate no matter how good they are).
7. Attend the available political debates for your position of choice. Even if only one person shows up, there is just as likely a chance that the whole thing will be recorded and posted online for other viewers. You don't want to be seen as a candidate with no interest.
Above all, be kind and respectful in your conversations while campaigning. You never know who you are talking to and who you might end up working with once elected. Also, have fun. You're keeping the conversation going and you want to make your corner of the world a better place. Thank you for your effort!
Posts: 181
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2018
Reputation:
38
(09-25-2022, 12:25 PM)Bytor Wrote: Video of Ward 9 debate is up at https://youtu.be/5WVvTDuPdyg in 360p with the 1080p still processing, so probably another hour, potentially 2, for that.
The Record has updated the inaccurate phrasing now and will apparently print a correction in their next print edition. https://twitter.com/m2bowman/status/1574...BwTTPf2zDw
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2022
Reputation:
0
(09-25-2022, 05:48 PM)robson ward 9 Wrote: (09-22-2022, 06:38 PM)throwaway Wrote: I'm someone that has met Matthew personally prior to this, hence the anonymous account. His current behaviour, including the decision to run for office, is the result of a pretty severe mental health crisis stemming from family issues. When in good health he'd probably be a decent councillor, but obviously he's in no shape to be holding office right now. I'm not suggesting anyone vote for him, but I think some compassion in how we discuss him is warranted.
I was a disgrace that evening. A little background, earlier that morning I learned that a friend from the golf industry had passed away in a motorcycle accident on Tuesday evening. I wasn't my best and was disrespectful to the church and organizers. I am sorry for this.
I'll provide a more formal response in short order but I'm representing those who need it (those without housing) vs. the establishment and established neighbourhoods. If I don't feel i'm going to be able to win, I will put my support behind Brooklin as I feel she has the best opportunity to oppose the academic who doesn't understand basic economics or construction financing.
Talk soon. RIP Jolley.
I was a close friend to Brian and his family, please do not use his passing as an excuse for your behaviour, it’s disrespectful to his life.
It is clear that you are not well, please focus on getting help for yourself.
Posts: 3,851
Threads: 63
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
197
This election season is wild.
Posts: 8
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2022
Reputation:
0
(09-27-2022, 12:37 PM)Throwaway2 Wrote: (09-25-2022, 05:48 PM)robson ward 9 Wrote: I was a disgrace that evening. A little background, earlier that morning I learned that a friend from the golf industry had passed away in a motorcycle accident on Tuesday evening. I wasn't my best and was disrespectful to the church and organizers. I am sorry for this.
I'll provide a more formal response in short order but I'm representing those who need it (those without housing) vs. the establishment and established neighbourhoods. If I don't feel i'm going to be able to win, I will put my support behind Brooklin as I feel she has the best opportunity to oppose the academic who doesn't understand basic economics or construction financing.
Talk soon. RIP Jolley.
I was a close friend to Brian and his family, please do not use his passing as an excuse for your behaviour, it’s disrespectful to his life.
It is clear that you are not well, please focus on getting help for yourself.
This is why my moto is call/meet in person and don't text. Sorry for your/our loss. Internet warriors..... I'm done. peace....
Posts: 3,851
Threads: 63
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
197
Posts: 781
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
61
At the Ward 9 debate, Debbie Chapman claimed that there was a report showing that Kitchener has not only met but exceeded provincial density targets. I cannot find any report on the Kitcher.ca
Does anybody know what she might be referring to?
Posts: 188
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2020
Reputation:
8
It boils my blood how Debbie lives in a large beautiful detached home right around the corner from the development she rejected. She claims that she wants more affordable housing. I believe the majority of those condos would have been much more affordable than a million dollar detached house. Such a hypocrite. Now that lot will sit empty for the next decade while future generations are forced to leave Kitchener or live in tents.
Posts: 1,711
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
131
If that is indeed the case, she should not have voted.
Posts: 7,599
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
196
(09-28-2022, 01:14 PM)Joedelay Highhoe Wrote: It boils my blood how Debbie lives in a large beautiful detached home right around the corner from the development she rejected. She claims that she wants more affordable housing. I believe the majority of those condos would have been much more affordable than a million dollar detached house. Such a hypocrite. Now that lot will sit empty for the next decade while future generations are forced to leave Kitchener or live in tents.
Hear hear!
Do you have a source for where her home is? I feel like that would qualify as a pecuniary interest no?
|
