Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TriTAG 2014 Municipal Candidates' Survey
#1
Exclamation 
TriTAG (In Particular Mike Boos and Chris Klein) have been putting a lot of work into the following site: the 2014 Municipal Election Voters' Kit Check it out here: http://tritag.ca/election2014/
Reply


#2
When were the surveys sent out? Knowing that date could help determine how responsive a particular candidate is.
Reply
#3
This is a great resource! And a must read if you haven't already. Thanks everyone at TriTAG!
Reply
#4
(10-02-2014, 10:36 AM)dunkalunk Wrote: TriTAG (In Particular Mike Boos and Chris Klein) have been putting a lot of work into the following site: the 2014 Municipal Election Voters' Kit Check it out here: http://tritag.ca/election2014/

Thanks for posting this link!  I've found it very helpful!
Reply
#5
Awesome! I've been looking for something like this to guide my voting. 
Reply
#6
A Cambridge mayoral candidate in favour of LRT?! Will wonders never cease!
Reply
#7
May I offer a dissenting voice and say that forcing sidewalks everywhere is not good policy? I am quite grumpy about the strongarm tactics TriTAG is using to try and force the people on Kennedy Avenue to cut down trees and put in sidewalks that they neither want nor need. If you are going to advocate for sidewalks then let's talk about busy streets like Victoria instead.

I use sidewalks and have no problem with putting them in place for new development and where it makes sense during upgrades. Neither is the case for Kennedy Avenue.
Reply


#8
It's fine to disagree with TriTAG's positions, (you'll find there are some candidates on the survey we've published who do), but I'm a bit confused where the "strongarm tactics" accusation is coming from. We're open about our positions and our work, and we offered candidates the opportunity to share their own on our website without comment or endorsement.
Reply
#9
Paul Tavares' comments are interesting:

Quote:I do not support the LRT in Waterloo Region.

Any further development within Cambridge should be focussed on more urbanization and densification of our population growth. Fewer restrictions, especially those of building height, would encourage developers to come to our region.

So density but without a framework to support it. Hmm...
Reply
#10
Ummm wouldn't LRT promote the exact things he wants?
Reply
#11
Looks like Sandra Hill will be getting my vote. She's the only Cambridge mayoral candidate who has come out in support of LRT.
Reply
#12
(10-03-2014, 09:32 AM)mboos Wrote: It's fine to disagree with TriTAG's positions, (you'll find there are some candidates on the survey we've published who do), but I'm a bit confused where the "strongarm tactics" accusation is coming from. We're open about our positions and our work, and we offered candidates the opportunity to share their own on our website without comment or endorsement.

"without comment or endorsement" is a little disingenuous. I agree that you do not comment on the responses from particular candidates, but you certainly do lay out your positions, and the implicit expectation is that you would prefer candidates who support your views to be elected.

Maybe "strongarm tactics" is not exactly the right phrase -- you do not always get your way (thank goodness) and you do not have enforcement power. But you do take a "one size fits all" approach in your walkability positions, and you have an unfortunate tendency to dismiss the concerns of people who do not follow your proposed policies. Despite the fact that Kennedy/Palmer are perfectly walkable and safe as-is, if you had your way you would force sidewalks upon the residents, because you don't want to set bad precedents. You dismiss any legitimate claims that the residents might have against sidewalks on both sides of the road with the statement "The problem is that we all need a rich and complete sidewalk network, but the temptation for "Not In My Front Yard" is strong." No doubt you will find some pretext to dismiss my commentary despite the fact that I am in exactly the demographic you are trying to protect: an occasional visitor to the area who does not live there, and gets around by bicycle or foot. (I am guessing "the plural of anecdote is not data" or "your experience is not universal" or something, but maybe you will surprise me.) You are not willing to admit that the marginal increase in safety you *might* get if you forced sidewalks on both sides of the streets in that area is more than offset by the loss of trees, which are also an important factor in walkability.

The fact is that we do not actually (or should not actually) care about sidewalks. When thinking about walkability, we should care about safety and accessibility. Palmer and Kennedy already achieve that with sidewalks on one side of the road, because the roads are not thoroughfares for motor traffic. They are extended driveways, just like all of the cul-de-sac driveways in the suburbs, except that they are straight streets. Unlike some of the other streets mentioned in Chris's blog here: http://waterloons.blogspot.ca/2014/02/fo...ewalk.html , it is trivial to cross the street at any point of the road, because they are dead quiet. They are so quiet that I would have few qualms about walking right up the centre of the street.
It is true that Kennedy is on an incline, but that has not been a problem even in the winter (and until the City either clears all sidewalks itself or seriously enforces the shoveling bylaws that is not something you can say for sidewalks).

The worst thing is that instead of making allies around this issue, you have mobilized a community against you. I certainly do not know everybody on those streets, but the few people I do know seem largely aligned with your views. But they are not very happy with your position on this issue, and I think Paul Stickney is right: TriTAG wields a lot of power in this municipality.
Reply
#13
(10-03-2014, 11:39 PM)fakepnijjar Wrote: The worst thing is that instead of making allies around this issue, you have mobilized a community against you.

Really? I'd love to know more about this community that has risen up against the mighty TriTAG.
Reply


#14
Quote:I agree that you do not comment on the responses from particular candidates, but you certainly do lay out your positions, and the implicit expectation is that you would prefer candidates who support your views to be elected.

Without comment on candidates' positions is exactly what I meant. It's up to readers to decide who aligns the most with their own individual point of view.

We take stances on issues, not candidates, as we'll do our best to work with any electee. We wouldn't be much of an advocacy group though if we didn't have any positions of our own or merely kept them to ourselves.
Reply
#15
(10-03-2014, 11:39 PM)fakepnijjar Wrote: "without comment or endorsement" is a little disingenuous. I agree that you do not comment on the responses from particular candidates, but you certainly do lay out your positions, and the implicit expectation is that you would prefer candidates who support your views to be elected.

Candidates also practice disingenuity, probably more deliberately and skillfully than groups like TriTAG. 

Do you suppose that a candidate who is against sidewalks is going to respond to a like-minded group in exactly the same words that he responds to a similar question from TriTAG?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links