Posts: 2,017
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
46
(10-17-2018, 05:18 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: (10-17-2018, 04:01 PM)Momo26 Wrote: Still ~2 hour and $17 GO train ride even if living at the hub - of course you don't have to worry about getting to the train and parking etc but still, that length of GO train ride per way is such a turn off.
I commuted to Union station for nearly 4 years - almost always took the Milton line train from Milton and never once took the Kitchener train when working downtown (have since taken it once as a one-off) - I do live in the West end so getting on the 401 made a bit more sense though.
Any word on FAST rapid trains? Those require new tracks right? Or word on electrifying the GO train with express to maybe reduce that GO train ride by at least 20 mins?
I believe it can be reduced to around 1:30 by improving the tracks to eliminate slow orders and adding longer passing sidings and tracks in strategic locations. If HSR comes that would of course be even faster but is much more expensive.
We can probably take the 1:40 VIA Rail time as the best possible time under the current tracking (and fewer stops than GO). I hope that the current provincial government doesn't interfere with the new track, which should help.
Posts: 1,090
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
31
Based off some comments over at Urban Toronto, the work in Guelph this year is preface to more work next year which should speed up some of the slower sections of the line significantly.
Posts: 4,483
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
133
Per the P&W agenda ( https://calendar.regionofwaterloo.ca/Cou...202018.pdf page 115), the RFP is being terminated.
Quote:Based on the Region’s RFP requirements, the parties discussed the proponent’s preliminary development vision in respect of timing, configuration, design and size of the development including the required on-site transit components, and business model for the overall development. As a result of these discussions, the Project Team is of the view that the proponent’s vision for the project does not align with the Region’s expectations as expressed in the RFP, including in respect of the integration of mixed uses in the overall design and the prevailing market conditions. In these circumstances, the KVTH Steering Committee has concluded that continuing the current procurement process will not result in a successful outcome. The KVTH Steering Committee is recommending that the current RFP process be terminated and that a range of alternative approaches be further evaluated to determine the best way to achieve the original project vision without jeopardizing the committed Provincial funding.
Posts: 10,545
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
334
I'm guessing the consortium thought they had the upper hand, as the only bidder in the RFP, and maybe overplayed their cards.
Here's hoping that those "alternative approaches" have a better outcome.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
What!!?? What does this mean for the whole project?! Timeline? Scope?
“Terminate” sounds bad.
Posts: 667
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation:
26
11-03-2018, 08:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2018, 08:28 AM by trainspotter139.)
(11-03-2018, 08:00 AM)Canard Wrote: What!!?? What does this mean for the whole project?! Timeline? Scope?
“Terminate” sounds bad.
Basically the chosen proponent produced a proposal (within the timeline given) that the Region deemed to not meet their expectations and is now recommending the RFP process be terminated to consider other options for building the site.
Posts: 6,599
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
100
At least a two year delay, one imagines.
Posts: 1,781
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
151
(11-03-2018, 09:29 AM)panamaniac Wrote: At least a two year delay, one imagines.
Now that is a "glass is half full" attitude right there. I will be surprised if we see anything happen in five years.
Posts: 4,927
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
127
That's absolutely awful.
The fact that there were so few submissions tells me there was something wrong with the Region's RFP process in the first place. Were there red flags?
Posts: 1,090
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
31
My guess is the developer wasn't too keen on the transit hub requirement because it would cut into their revenues (even though it is(who knows if this will still be the case with the current government) being paid for by the province.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
This is gutwrenchingly awful.
Posts: 989
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
29
This all means no rapid transit train plan London to KW then KW to union?
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
11-03-2018, 01:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2018, 01:52 PM by Canard.)
If so, it’ll be on a wooden temporary platform.
...OR, they’ll put the dome back up, and use that.
Posts: 4,927
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
127
Posts: 1,090
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
31
Everything is speculation at this point. For all we know, this will be the better path forward.
|