Welcome Guest! In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away. Login or Create an Account
The limit drops down to 45 km/h when crossing Colby/Conestogo. I agree that it's weird to see that sign, and not a fixed, higher speed sign (60?) through here at that point to resume to. All I can figure is in-cab signaling with some variable limit at this point based on upstream traffic but I can't imagine that's the case since then it'd also be used on the spur, too (which it's not, as evidenced by the speed limit signs on it).
One of them is on Charles immediately north of Water as seen in the project agreement, but I am wondering how these stops will actually work in practice because there is no curb cuts to access the bus stop island and it isn't tied in to the pedestrian crosswalk.
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.
(10-03-2016, 09:34 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Over on the GRT thread I mentioned some new GRT bus stop signs appearing along King and Charles.
One of them is on Charles immediately north of Water as seen in the project agreement, but I am wondering how these stops will actually work in practice because there is no curb cuts to access the bus stop island and it isn't tied in to the pedestrian crosswalk.
Just guessing, but won't the bus stop and the passengers get on and off? No, seriously, I am having trouble understanding what you've described. Maybe post a pic?
(10-03-2016, 09:34 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Over on the GRT thread I mentioned some new GRT bus stop signs appearing along King and Charles.
One of them is on Charles immediately north of Water as seen in the project agreement, but I am wondering how these stops will actually work in practice because there is no curb cuts to access the bus stop island and it isn't tied in to the pedestrian crosswalk.
Just guessing, but won't the bus stop and the passengers get on and off? No, seriously, I am having trouble understanding what you've described. Maybe post a pic?
I believe what Pheidippides is saying is that there is no depressed portion of the curb to get pedestrians from the sidewalk, across the tracks, to the island / bus stop without tripping.
(10-04-2016, 09:19 AM)GtwoK Wrote: ...
I believe what Pheidippides is saying is that there is no depressed portion of the curb to get pedestrians from the sidewalk, across the tracks, to the island / bus stop without tripping.
And you know, for those who might have some difficulty with a curb.
There is a depression in the concrete. Like the platforms for the stations, it's at the crosswalk at the end, where it should be. To have it anywhere else would intice people to cross at an unsafe location.
10-04-2016, 11:58 AM (This post was last modified: 10-04-2016, 11:59 AM by isUsername.)
The obstruction sign is also wrong. I don't know whether it should be a gold-and-black chevron type, or a diagonal-down and left type, but it definitely shouldn't be a diagonal-down and right type.