Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 16 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
(09-25-2022, 08:08 PM)bravado Wrote:
(09-25-2022, 08:07 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: To be fair, the same applies to the road network: if we properly maintained it, it would be even more unreasonably expensive than it already is.

Oh man that's my dream... imagine if the average voter heard about how expensive the roads are as often as they heard about how expensive the LRT is.

I tried with comparing that short section of Highland getting an expansion being equal or greater cost than the whole downtown cycling grid network. Doesn't work.
Reply


(09-29-2022, 09:15 PM)cherrypark Wrote:
(09-25-2022, 08:08 PM)bravado Wrote: Oh man that's my dream... imagine if the average voter heard about how expensive the roads are as often as they heard about how expensive the LRT is.

I tried with comparing that short section of Highland getting an expansion being equal or greater cost than the whole downtown cycling grid network. Doesn't work.

It rarely works. The opposition just move the goalposts. I find that's when the idea of merit comes up as "only build it where there's enough cyclists".
Reply
(09-30-2022, 12:14 PM)Bytor Wrote:
(09-29-2022, 09:15 PM)cherrypark Wrote: I tried with comparing that short section of Highland getting an expansion being equal or greater cost than the whole downtown cycling grid network. Doesn't work.

It rarely works. The opposition just move the goalposts. I find that's when the idea of merit comes up as "only build it where there's enough cyclists".

Yeah...this is something I've come to realize. The way to convince people is not to give them facts and figures. People who are convinced by facts and figures are already convinced--or at least not in opposition because they don't have any facts and figures.

The way to convince most people is to tell stories, give a compelling narrative. It's an unfortunate realization for me because I'm much better at facts and figures than I am at storytelling.
Reply
Bad driving and surface running rapid transit meet again.

[Image: MvYPbD1.jpg]
Reply
One starts to wonder whether it's intentional ....
Reply
90% of the LRT accidents are brought to you by Jay Fencing!
Reply
https://mobile.twitter.com/threestations...9734325249

Apparently Waterloo has Canada's only electrified mainline railway tracks.
Reply


Huh...I guess that's true. Sad...but technically true.

I wonder if the electrical systems could actually supply a mainline locomotive though. In some ways you think no way that would be built to those standards, we're just moving around a few little LRVs. But then you also look at how ridiculously overbuilt our system is (with the significant exception of pedestrian and station infra...because you know...wouldn't wanna spend too much on that) and frankly, it's possible that it would.
Reply
(10-07-2022, 02:41 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I wonder if the electrical systems could actually supply a mainline locomotive though. 

It couldn't, as those trains must take the gauntlet tracks at Laurier, UW, and R&T, so the catenary would not be aligned properly.
Reply
(10-07-2022, 03:05 PM)KevinL Wrote:
(10-07-2022, 02:41 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I wonder if the electrical systems could actually supply a mainline locomotive though. 

It couldn't, as those trains must take the gauntlet tracks at Laurier, UW, and R&T, so the catenary would not be aligned properly.

How far do the gauntlet tracks move the trains away from the stations? The catenary isn't a precise alignment, it's meant to shift around in fact, within some limits.
Reply
(10-07-2022, 04:42 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(10-07-2022, 03:05 PM)KevinL Wrote: It couldn't, as those trains must take the gauntlet tracks at Laurier, UW, and R&T, so the catenary would not be aligned properly.

How far do the gauntlet tracks move the trains away from the stations? The catenary isn't a precise alignment, it's meant to shift around in fact, within some limits.

The gauntlet can't be more than a 6 inch offset. I suspect an electric loco would have no trouble going slowly along the spur.
Reply
(10-07-2022, 08:15 PM)jwilliamson Wrote:
(10-07-2022, 04:42 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: How far do the gauntlet tracks move the trains away from the stations? The catenary isn't a precise alignment, it's meant to shift around in fact, within some limits.

The gauntlet can't be more than a 6 inch offset. I suspect an electric loco would have no trouble going slowly along the spur.

I believe it’s actually closer to 30cm, but that’s just a nitpick. I don’t know how much of an offset could work, but that doesn’t matter, because a second wire could be strung above the offset track. It might also be possible to just move the wire towards the offset track; I don’t know how widely it weaves back and forth normally but I wouldn’t be surprised if the gauntlet offset is within that range.
Reply
(10-07-2022, 02:41 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I wonder if the electrical systems could actually supply a mainline locomotive though. In some ways you think no way that would be built to those standards, we're just moving around a few little LRVs. But then you also look at how ridiculously overbuilt our system is (with the significant exception of pedestrian and station infra...because you know...wouldn't wanna spend too much on that) and frankly, it's possible that it would.

Power requirements really depend on acceleration, maintaining speed is easy. LRVs accelerate significantly faster than freight, which balances the electrical demand somewhat. I'm sure with sufficiently slow acceleration it could work in theory.

In practice, we have 750 VDC electrification. Common for trams, subways, occasional commuter rail, but not used by freight. So any locomotive would have to be custom for our system. At that point you could have a custom adjustable offset pantograph for the gauntlet track... but we're way into fantasy land.
Reply


(10-08-2022, 03:05 AM)taylortbb Wrote:
(10-07-2022, 02:41 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I wonder if the electrical systems could actually supply a mainline locomotive though. In some ways you think no way that would be built to those standards, we're just moving around a few little LRVs. But then you also look at how ridiculously overbuilt our system is (with the significant exception of pedestrian and station infra...because you know...wouldn't wanna spend too much on that) and frankly, it's possible that it would.

Power requirements really depend on acceleration, maintaining speed is easy. LRVs accelerate significantly faster than freight, which balances the electrical demand somewhat. I'm sure with sufficiently slow acceleration it could work in theory.

In practice, we have 750 VDC electrification. Common for trams, subways, occasional commuter rail, but not used by freight. So any locomotive would have to be custom for our system. At that point you could have a custom adjustable offset pantograph for the gauntlet track... but we're way into fantasy land.

I think using our 1-2 km of spur line track for electrified freight movement is already fantasy.
Reply
Since we're in the realm of fantasy, how about this scenario:

1. Metrolinx finally electrifies the Kitchener corridor
2. CN uses the Kitchener corridor as a proof of concept for electric freight haulage since the catenary is in place (CN bought their first battery electric locomotive in November 2021; they last operated a pantograph electric locomotive in 1995)
3. The Waterloo spur is used as a test bed for short haul freight service up to Elmira, either using a catenary the whole way, or some other battery operated solution.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links