ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit

[Canard]

Yeah - scroll up to KevinL's post above; the Holland rail welding team are now on Charles, welding together the sections there.

Why this is super-exciting: it means this section of road will not reopen until the tracks are in the ground... Which means we'll likely see that happen within the next 3 months!

[KevinL]

5.12 km of rail... 2.56 km of track

1.28km of double track!

All true! Thanks for the corrections, folks. 

[timc]

Research and Technology station
August 15, 2015

Is that some sort of concrete form?

What does everyone think the LRT users will call the Research and Technology Station? Users will never stick with that politically motivated name and the too long when your drunk name? 

"I'm only going as far as "RTS"? 

I get on at the "RT" and off at "Caroline"!

Thoughts on this name mess and the others?

Possibly the same name as the current iXpress stop: R&T Park?

Or maybe "North Campus"? "Phillip"? "That stop nobody uses"?

[Canard]

Some photos from along Charles.

   

   

   

[Canard]

   
A water line with quick-connect couplings is being installed on Courtland.

   
Looking Southwest down Borden from Courtland Avenue.

   
Looking Northbound on Charles.

[KevinL]

Middle photo in the second post is Borden alongside Schneiders, yes? That's looking really good.

Incidentally, I understand University Ave is now reopened!

[Canard]

Yeah that's right, it's Borden!  There was a big foundation and cover on the "South" corner, for what looked to me like a big stoplight pole or train warning light pole.  It unfortunately basically decimated that person's yard.    The North West side of Borden where the tracks go looks like it has for a week or two now, no signs of Overhead Conductor System (OCS/"Catpole") work that I could see.

The latest ion update suggested that work at the Seagram crossing would start tomorrow, so that makes sense with the timing of University being back open as they move all their equipment over there!

On the subject of the warning lights, I really am curious to see what the final design of all the intersections will be with respect to lights, mechanical barriers, etc. - I know it's marked on some of the Design Reference Documents, but there are a lot of areas that aren't, that I think will need to have something...  Houston's system has gone totally overboard with this because they had so many crashes but their warning lights are really sharp - many of the stop lights (just regular 3-lamp traffic lights) have an additional red/orange rectangular"Halo" around the outside that illuminates when a train is approaching.

Yesterday, August 15, was the one-year anniversary of groundwork for the project.

[Markster]

The latest ion update suggested that work at the Seagram crossing would start tomorrow, so that makes sense with the timing of University being back open as they move all their equipment over there!

Seagram actually started on Friday. It was closed that day. A lot of traffic that was expecting to use it to detour around the University closure was a bit surprised!

On the subject of the warning lights, I really am curious to see what the final design of all the intersections will be with respect to lights, mechanical barriers, etc.

Yeah, I'm wondering this too. Crossings like University and Columbia are totally appropriate for traditional rail gates, and I'm wondering if they'll go that way. I can't imagine them putting gates in for the street-running sections.

[GtwoK]

I'm curious now; when they have all the "utility work" (ie water mains, sanitary, storm) to do on the roads that the track will be running along, what is it they're actually DOING? I had hypothesized that they would want no interruption to to Ion service at any point, and therefore no construction involving track removal. As such, they were probably replacing water mains et al to something permanent, that would't require ever being replaced.

Looking at the photos of Borden now, the road and curb seem to be relatively in the same place as before, and could still have the wet works running beneath the road with no interaction with the Ion track. So what are they doing for these many months per stretch of road regarding wet works?

[BuildingScout]

On the subject of the warning lights, I really am curious to see what the final design of all the intersections will be with respect to lights, mechanical barriers, etc.

Yeah, I'm wondering this too.  Crossings like University and Columbia are totally appropriate for traditional rail gates, and I'm wondering if they'll go that way. I can't imagine them putting gates in for the street-running sections.

I think they will need mechanical barriers in all cross intersections. Particularly along King when left turns are allowed. Unless they do this, people will try to start a turn left into the red light at the same time as the train is coming.

[mpd618]

I'm curious now; when they have all the "utility work" (ie water mains, sanitary, storm) to do on the roads that the track will be running along, what is it they're actually DOING? I had hypothesized that they would want no interruption to to Ion service at any point, and therefore no construction involving track removal. As such, they were probably replacing water mains et al to something permanent, that would't require ever being replaced.

My understanding/guess is that it is a combination of moving the utilities so they are not under the tracks, and setting up the utilities in such a way that they can be serviced from the side (in particular, at intersections).

[JCnb]

A water line with quick-connect couplings is being installed on Courtland.


Looking Southwest down Borden from Courtland Avenue.


Looking Northbound on Charles.

In the Borden shot, thos white bags on the right side look like concrete bases? CAT pole bases?

[Markster]

I think they will need mechanical barriers in all cross intersections. Particularly along King when left turns are allowed. Unless they do this, people will try to start a turn left into the red light at the same time as the train is coming.

Is that not the point of the red light? To stop people from turning?

Street running LRT in Seattle, Portland, and LA manage to survive without crossing bars at all conflict points.

[GtwoK]

I think they will need mechanical barriers in all cross intersections. Particularly along King when left turns are allowed. Unless they do this, people will try to start a turn left into the red light at the same time as the train is coming.

Is that not the point of the red light? To stop people from turning?

Street running LRT in Seattle, Portland, and LA manage to survive without crossing bars at all conflict points.

I believe BuildingScout was referring to when a driver parallel to the tracks has a green light, with the tracks on their left side, the driver may attempt to turn left—thereby crossing the tracks. Potentially while a train is coming.

That being said, I would assume trains will proceed and have their OWN green light while both the parallel and perpendicular directions have a red light. That way, no driver will be attempting any turn in the intersection at that point.

[Canard]

I assume all traffic will get a red and then the trains will get a "T" light.

The situation GtwoK describes is the one that Metro (Houston) has the most trouble with:



Note that all but 2 of the crashes here are Left-Turns right into the train's path. Also note the dates!