09-29-2018, 11:42 AM
I'll try to swing by a platform and look for myself.
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
|
09-29-2018, 11:42 AM
I'll try to swing by a platform and look for myself.
09-29-2018, 12:29 PM
09-29-2018, 12:34 PM
Nice!
09-29-2018, 12:36 PM
(09-29-2018, 12:29 PM)Canard Wrote: Looks like someone already did: You beat me to it. I was about to post that same picture here (I was the one that took that about 15-20 mins ago)
09-29-2018, 01:00 PM
(09-29-2018, 12:36 PM)bgb_ca Wrote:(09-29-2018, 12:29 PM)Canard Wrote: Looks like someone already did: Feel free to post it. It's nice to not have to follow a link to see it.
The HMI on the TVM on the Borden SB platform has been destroyed.
![]()
09-29-2018, 03:47 PM
What do those acronyms mean?
09-29-2018, 05:06 PM
09-29-2018, 05:52 PM
(09-29-2018, 01:00 PM)Spokes Wrote:(09-29-2018, 12:36 PM)bgb_ca Wrote: You beat me to it. I was about to post that same picture here (I was the one that took that about 15-20 mins ago) Here ya go. Edit: it don't seem to want to attach
09-30-2018, 03:47 PM
It worked for me, here we go:
ION LRV 511 Arrival and Offload:
Note: 508 and 509 appear in this video as a pair at 6:20 into the clip, with both pantos up and each fully powered.
...K
10-01-2018, 03:16 PM
When the LRVs are acting as pair, will there only be one driver, or will there be a need a driver in the trailing unit?
10-01-2018, 04:04 PM
(10-01-2018, 03:16 PM)nms Wrote: When the LRVs are acting as pair, will there only be one driver, or will there be a need a driver in the trailing unit? Just one driver. Their controls will control the motors/doors/etc in both vehicles. The vehicles support longer trains too, up to 6 vehicles I think, not that we have the platforms for that.
10-01-2018, 04:09 PM
(10-01-2018, 04:04 PM)taylortbb Wrote:(10-01-2018, 03:16 PM)nms Wrote: When the LRVs are acting as pair, will there only be one driver, or will there be a need a driver in the trailing unit? This is why almost all subway expansion proposals for Toronto are idiotic. Any underused subway could be built as LRT for less, but later expanded gradually as traffic levels increase. The only exceptions would be places where the demand almost immediately will require long trains and grade separation. At present as far as I can tell that means the Relief line and only the Relief line. Certainly not the Richmond Hill extension, Scarborough, or Sheppard. Or even Vaughan, for that matter, but that construction project is an unrecoverable sunk cost. (04-13-2018, 04:38 PM)Canard Wrote: I think that's the first I've seen of a concrete number. An upcoming event where the public is being invited to help out and try their hand at blacksmithing reminded me of the above. So, we've blown past basically all of these. ![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|