ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit

[Canard]

Yeah I noticed that on my bike ride yesterday while walking it through the intersection. I thought "...oh, this doesn't line up".

[bpoland]

While we're on this topic, does anyone know why they don't paint lines on the concrete, only on the asphalt?  I can't imagine the lines would affect LRT operation.  Northbound on King at Allen, there are dashed lines to help the traffic move from the right side of the tracks to the left side, but there's a big gap on the concrete and tracks themselves which could confuse drivers.

[Canard]

I don't know; I hope they will, like they did in Australia for G:Link.

My guess is they will do that when they do the final top layer of asphalt. They probably only want to mark the concrete once, because it's permanent. The asphalt is easily removed/replaced.

[danbrotherston]

I was in the area today, and it looks like this is happening. The pedestrian crossing button and bumps are both on that side of the post, although the paint on the road hasn't been changed.

I take it that only the paint is changing, not the pedestrian island?

[Markster]

I was in the area today, and it looks like this is happening. The pedestrian crossing button and bumps are both on that side of the post, although the paint on the road hasn't been changed.

I take it that only the paint is changing, not the pedestrian island?

The paint disagreed with the technical drawings.
The island doesn't.    

[Canard]

I like the island. I've used it several times now. But we've discussed that to death already, and it's not going anywhere.

[timc]

Yeah, I don't see any change happening with the island.

[timc]

In other news, I also saw a glass truck in the vicinity of the Phillip/R&T Park station today.

[DHLawrence]

Stage 1 routing has been decided and is set.
Stage 2 is still under consideration. Some new information about the feasibility of the rail crossing on Eagle street  came to light which necessitated the Region re-examine the routing for Stage 2. The Region was to present their preferred option for Stage 2 ION this fall, however the consultations have been pushed into the winter.

I can't believe Shantz Hill is on the books again. It is physically impossible for a rail vehicle of any kind to make that incline without a rack. Maple Grove solves the problem but then you have it running through greenfield development, exactly what light rail is meant to hold back - not to mention eliminating Preston service entirely is going to be politically unpalatable. It's going to look like another project that feeds Galt and ignores the rest of the city.

The Galt alternative routes make more sense to me. The hill at GCI is too steep. Rerouting does reduce the likelihood of a connection with a future GO service, unless GO trains are long enough to reach the LRT right of way or they give up on using the old station. The walk would be too long. Proposing a GO station for downtown Galt is certainly an interesting thought, but I would have thought the creek parallel to Beverley was a flood plain, therefore off limits to development.

[KevinL]

I believe the idea for Shantz Hill was to ease the grade by partially elevating the track - possibly right across the Speed, if using that alignment. It's tricky, but not impossible.

[DHLawrence]

An elevated track at the base of Shantz Hill would look hideous. I hope they can come up with a better idea.

[Canard]

I can't believe Shantz Hill is on the books again. It is physically impossible for a rail vehicle of any kind to make that incline without a rack.

Is it steeper than 6%?

[BuildingScout]

I believe the idea for Shantz Hill was to ease the grade by partially elevating the track - possibly right across the Speed, if using that alignment. It's tricky, but not impossible.

Or by deepening the cut as it was done on Highway 6 entering Hamilton. What used to be a steep drop over <50m way back in the day became a gradual slope over ~400m in length.

I seem to remember an official bringing this up as an option if Shantz Hill was chosen. It would be expensive, that's for sure, but again not impossible.

[BuildingScout]

I can't believe Shantz Hill is on the books again. It is physically impossible for a rail vehicle of any kind to make that incline without a rack.

Is it steeper than 6%?

Looking at an elevation map looks close to 6% overall, so starting the drop a 100-200m earlier and smoothing out perfectly over the entire stretch would suffice.

[Canard]

Yep. Our stock trains already will do 6% on King between Victoria and Wellington.

TTC's Outlook can handle even steeper grades with minor modifications (additional powered bogie, and a different gear ratio in the reducer). So nothing outside the realm of possibility here.