02-05-2022, 05:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-05-2022, 05:16 PM by danbrotherston.)
(02-05-2022, 04:06 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote:(02-04-2022, 08:24 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: That doesn’t mean no charges. If I operate my table saw carelessly and injure or kill someone I could be charged even though there is no vehicle in sight.
I'm quite prepared to believe you might face criminal charges for killing or injuring someone with a table saw. However, drivers are rarely criminally charged for collisions with pedestrians even on public roads, and the bar is so high it usually only happens when they're impaired or grossly negligent.
There are many situations on private property where a driver would otherwise be charged under the HTA but gets off with no penalty. Think of that incident at the Mill Courtland Community Centre where someone just drove right over a man sitting on a raised curb area with his belongings in a completely empty parking lot. WRPS straight up said there was nothing they could charge the driver with because the HTA didn't apply and it didn't meet the threshold for criminal charges.
Yeah, exactly this.
I recall a crash in Toronto where a driver, in the middle of a left turn, stopped looking at the road and started looking for a water bottle under their seat, of course, since they are in the middle of a turn, they ended up jumping the curb and maiming several pedestrians. They were charged with dangerous operation, and the judge ruled against the crown stating "this driving does not significantly deviate from the accepted standard of driving"...
If the acceptable standard of driving is look away from the road during crucial seconds of a high risk maneuver, resulting in multiple live changing industries, then I don't want to participate in this society.
Leaving aside the road design issues, and car culture, this acceptance of what I believe is criminal negligence causing serious injury and death is utterly insane.