08-01-2021, 03:52 PM
(08-01-2021, 03:39 PM)jamincan Wrote: Yeah, but when discussing catchment for the airport, it is clearly relevant.
Yes, but that did not appear to be what was being referred to.
The catchment area is significantly larger than 700k, so just adding Guelph to make the numbers line up doesn't make sense to me.
In any case, I'll admit that was really just a nitpick, not the most important point.