06-27-2021, 08:17 PM
(06-27-2021, 08:12 PM)jamincan Wrote:Interesting til. Seems a little weird but good to know.(06-27-2021, 11:49 AM)Bjays93 Wrote: Interesting note on this development from talking to my aunt and uncle. The development was originally submitted wrongly as 201 and corrected. Additionally the application was made to the city nearly 6 months before the developer purchased the property.
I cant imagine that's something very typical
I don't think it's that uncommon for a purchase to be contingent on development approvals.