09-15-2020, 02:57 PM
(09-15-2020, 02:43 PM)robdrimmie Wrote:(09-15-2020, 01:12 PM)the_councillor Wrote: I agree, and that's another reason city-clearing didn't make sense. The data showed that even the $10M/yr City clearing option left 6% of sidewalks impassible! Down from 15% in resident-cleared non-pilot areas. $10M/yr to reduce the problem areas by 9% is neither effective nor efficient.
Dan pointed this out, but I need to chime in on what a terrible disingenuous presentation of the data.You're either lying or presenting yourself as incompetent when you say that 15% to 6% is reduction "by 9%".
So which is it? Are you lying or are you referencing data (which you don't bother to source, either) that you aren't able to understand?
oh man... neither Dan nor I are incorrect but let's put it another way to be clear.
Presently, for every 100 homes with a sidewalk, 15 aren't passable. If we spend $10 million/yr we clear 9 of those 15... but 6 are still impassable.
The source is in the data in the staff report.
No need to be cruel, this is why people avoid engaging.