09-15-2020, 02:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-15-2020, 02:44 PM by robdrimmie.
Edit Reason: tense and formatting
)
(09-15-2020, 01:12 PM)the_councillor Wrote: I agree, and that's another reason city-clearing didn't make sense. The data showed that even the $10M/yr City clearing option left 6% of sidewalks impassible! Down from 15% in resident-cleared non-pilot areas. $10M/yr to reduce the problem areas by 9% is neither effective nor efficient.
Dan pointed this out, but I need to chime in on this terribly disingenuous presentation of the data. You're either lying or presenting yourself as incompetent when you say that 15% to 6% is reduction "by 9%".
So which is it? Are you lying or are you referencing data (which you don't bother to source, either) that you aren't able to understand?