04-29-2020, 09:08 AM
(04-28-2020, 09:00 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(04-28-2020, 08:42 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: To be fair, it is now moving many more cars at that slow speed than it did before, so it’s not a total failure.
But yes, $1 billion probably could have done more to improve mobility spent on transit or active transportation.
Similarly if the 401 were to be double-decked (at what fantastic price I shudder to imagine), it would move many more vehicles than it does now; but after not very long, not any faster than it does now.
But what is the value of moving cars?
Enough for those people to get in their cars and brave the congestion, at least. But that doesn’t make the 401 an efficient way to get those people to where they are going.
Quote:Is it actually moving more people, or are all of those people just making trips they would have chosen a different mode for or to a different farther destination than they would have chosen.
We've possibly increased pollution, and congestion, with no evidence we've improved mobility and opportunity.
No disagreement here.