09-10-2019, 06:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2019, 06:54 PM by danbrotherston.)
(09-10-2019, 04:27 PM)creative Wrote: Did they say that wearing a helmet would prevent a collision? No! Does it say that the pedestrian was at fault! No! Were the police at fault for the collision. No! I’ve crashed my bike many times where a helmet saved me much more serious injury. WRC
Well, thanks for clarifying that you don't understand what victim blaming is...
Including irrelevant, unrelated information, that has an inflamatory and misleading effect on readers of the story is victim blaming.
Are you honestly going to sit here and argue that people will not judge the cyclist more harshly if they are hit while not wearing a helmet? You know they will. That's why including the irrelevant and unrelated detail of the helmet is victim blaming.