11-07-2018, 02:27 PM
(07-06-2018, 10:08 AM)Markster Wrote: The meeting was postponed, so there was no discussion. The report that was widely derided suggesting removal of the Peppler crossing was sent back to staff.
Details are scant. Basically all we know is what's in that communication I quoted.
We don't know what staff have been directed to do. Are they going to consider both crossings now? Are they going to entrench on moving the crossing? We don't know.
So the Peppler crossing came back to committee yesterday
As a reminder, staff's position was to rebut the 2-crossing proposal (keeping the Peppler one, and adding a Laurel Trail one) saying for many reasons in some important book that this was bad.
The committee voted unanimously to direct staff to look at the 2 crossing option.
Quote:Regional council voted unanimously at a planning and works committee on Tuesday to look into keeping the Peppler Street crossing and add a second set of lights down the street, where the Laurel Creek Trail meets Bridgeport Road.https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener...-1.4891190
Finally.