10-29-2018, 09:35 PM
(10-29-2018, 09:25 PM)tomh009 Wrote: The property owner would have had to pay for the creation and painting of a mural (maybe not inexpensive, given the size of the wall). In this scenario, North paid the property owner for painting the ad on the wall. Can you blame the owner?
I'm sure the BIA and or the City could have contributed to the cost of a mural as both had/have an interest in seeing the site beautified and developed ASAP. Based on the owners other holdings I don't imagine the revenue from North paying for this would even make a drop in the bucket.