07-16-2018, 02:37 PM
(07-16-2018, 12:40 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(07-15-2018, 02:21 PM)plam Wrote: Yes. If they were working from maps they wouldn't see it. They would have to work from sat photos, which may not be part of their workflow, or as jeffster points out, the designers may have gotten overruled by people who only looked at the maps.
I’m pretty sure no project of this nature gets designed without site visits. Not noticing the plainly obvious existing paths is basically malpractice as far as I’m concerned. Now, as has been discussed by others, we’re never going to be able to figure out specifically whose fault it is — there may well have been junior designers who noticed them and suggested a crossing, or suggested looking at the issue, but who were overruled by more senior and less competent people. It’s even conceivable that Grandlinq asked the Region about it and staff there looked at their book and saw that there was no formal right-of-way so decided to ignore it. In this case it would be the fault of the Regional staff involved. We don’t know, but I don’t think it’s possible for this specific error to have been made without somebody dropping the ball.
What would you like them to do when they notice those paths?
They cannot legally open them without acquiring land, they weren't legally open before.
Frankly, I cannot understand this insistence on putting blame on individual failures. To me, this is quite clearly a failure of the system.