07-14-2018, 06:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-14-2018, 06:24 PM by clasher.
Edit Reason: spelling
)
That entire stretch was a stone-dust trail so someone should have realized that there was some official trail capacity being removed and not accommodated anywhere else, even if someone chose to ignore the informal crossings that existed. I agree there should be more than one crossing too... pretty much no excuse for it. No reason that the entire line couldn't have been walked through before construction.
I also think they need to formalize the crossing that still sort of exists just west of the Manitou/Courtland/Fairway intersection... the city could pony up some money since they want to build a bicycle network, the manitou lanes end here and just dump riders into an area with no infrastructure and heavy traffic.
I also think they need to formalize the crossing that still sort of exists just west of the Manitou/Courtland/Fairway intersection... the city could pony up some money since they want to build a bicycle network, the manitou lanes end here and just dump riders into an area with no infrastructure and heavy traffic.