03-19-2018, 04:46 PM
Ahh Outhit, I've not missed his misinformation about transit. But this article seems unusually poorly written. Maybe someone was in a hurry.
As a bonus, there's this little gem:
"The ridership plunge after 2013 erased — per cent of transit gains made when rail transit was planned and approved between 2006 and 2013."
I'm assuming the em (or en) dash is supposed to be a blank that should have been filled in before publishing.
As a bonus, there's this little gem:
"The ridership plunge after 2013 erased — per cent of transit gains made when rail transit was planned and approved between 2006 and 2013."
I'm assuming the em (or en) dash is supposed to be a blank that should have been filled in before publishing.