06-15-2017, 09:11 PM
Ugh more distractions that will complicate and slow down the TPAP process. If we can stop wasting time/energy/money on flashy but unreliable tech like hydrogen, and focus on getting electrification done right so we can start riding frequent RER trains as quickly as possible that'd be great thanks
I can rant on and on about it but will instead let people smarter than me speak:
https://seanmarshall.ca/2017/06/15/provi...y-hot-air/
P.S. A quick research shows that the McGuinty government proposed Full Cell GO trains back in 2007, and (as we now know) it went nowhere: https://stevemunro.ca/2007/09/15/when-wi...r-hot-air/

I can rant on and on about it but will instead let people smarter than me speak:
https://seanmarshall.ca/2017/06/15/provi...y-hot-air/
Quote:My fear is that this is yet another distraction from transportation needs in the here and now. Further, I worry that the “fuel cell technology symposium” will not only distract from the GO RER project, it will give credence to NIMBYs opposing electrification – be it the construction of gantries and overhead wires, or those worried about the effects of electromagnetism.
I have more faith in building sound, tested and true, transit systems than pursuing the newest technology there is. Electric trains have been around for over 100 years. Electric multiple unit regional rail as we know it is used in scores of cities worldwide, including Montreal, New York, and Philadelphia. Electric multiple unit trains (EMUs), which can be purchased from at least a half-dozen firms, are reliable, quick, and suitable for GO RER.
The provincial government has an unfortunate history of promoting new technologies that end either in failure — the 1970s-era GO-ALRT plans, for example, or the promotion of Ontario-made compressed natural gas (CNG) buses to replace electric trolley buses in Toronto and Hamilton in the early 1990s. (Those buses were either scrapped early, or converted to conventional diesel propulsion.) The Scarborough RT, originally planned as the nucleus of a conventional light rail network, was replaced by a propitiatory linear induction system heavily promoted by the province.
The idea of hydrogen-powered trains is attractive: they have zero at-source emissions; the Alstom train is train is exceptionally quiet, and only emits steam and condensed water. Electrification requires overhead gantries and wires, along with substations at regular intervals; hydrogen-powered trains require none of these expenses. What isn’t clear is whether hydrogen powered trains offer the other advantages of electric train operation, namely quick acceleration and deceleration needed for a frequent-stop regional rail service.
I want GO RER to be built, and I want it to be built right. I just fear that the attention given to an emerging technology will be yet another distraction, especially going into an election year.
P.S. A quick research shows that the McGuinty government proposed Full Cell GO trains back in 2007, and (as we now know) it went nowhere: https://stevemunro.ca/2007/09/15/when-wi...r-hot-air/
Quote:Of course, in the best tradition of Ontario transit projects, we could waste billions on a scheme that is an alleged technology leap and is greener than green. Spending money on facilities and services we actually need has always been a distant second consideration for transit planning in these parts.