06-12-2017, 10:51 PM
I still prefer Option 2. If they're serious about 3, I hope they consider a new passage under the tracks and not forcing trail users onto the narrow Park sidewalk. 4 is sort of decent, but I'd prefer avoiding Victoria.
1 is unlikely in any real short term scenario given the railways' well known foot-dragging. I agree that it should remain a hopeful long-term option.
1 is unlikely in any real short term scenario given the railways' well known foot-dragging. I agree that it should remain a hopeful long-term option.