https://twitter.com/GRT_ROW/status/855398227721539586
Why not have both PDF and HASTINFO?!
Or better yet, make their PDFs accessible to WCAG 2.0: https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/cr...ility.html
I was quite surprised that even made the AODA argument, considering all the other transit systems in the province that still have PDF options (GO, YRT, DRT, Brampton, Hamilton, London, Kingston, and so on...) The deadline for meeting the accessible website regulation was in fact January 1, 2014 under O. Reg. 191/11 s.14 (4). Are they all violating AODA requirements then?
And if any of these systems has made their PDFs meet accessibility standards, why can't GRT do it? Seems like money better spent than forcing riders to use this terrible HASTINFO interface with no other options.
Quote:Hi there, we will not be posting the PDF schedules on the website as we they do not comply with AODA accessibility standards.
Why not have both PDF and HASTINFO?!
Or better yet, make their PDFs accessible to WCAG 2.0: https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/cr...ility.html
I was quite surprised that even made the AODA argument, considering all the other transit systems in the province that still have PDF options (GO, YRT, DRT, Brampton, Hamilton, London, Kingston, and so on...) The deadline for meeting the accessible website regulation was in fact January 1, 2014 under O. Reg. 191/11 s.14 (4). Are they all violating AODA requirements then?
And if any of these systems has made their PDFs meet accessibility standards, why can't GRT do it? Seems like money better spent than forcing riders to use this terrible HASTINFO interface with no other options.