12-10-2014, 09:44 AM
The key difference here is that at Seagram, it is not a full intersection but a crosswalk that is signalized. I am curious what the standard is. I know that when I am traveling south on King by WLU, when the second crosswalk goes red for vehicular traffic, I am not stopped from turning left onto Lodge. In Seagram's case, the crosswalk is much closer to Seagram, but it is still a crosswalk light, not one that can be activated/used from the south side of Seagram, and not one that can be activated by cars turning left from Seagram to Albert. Is it not then the case that cars turning left from Albert onto Seagram can, seeing a red at the crosswalk on the other side of the intersection, turn left onto Seagram if no pedestrians are in the crosswalk crossing Seagram on the west side of Albert?