11-21-2014, 10:50 AM
(11-21-2014, 09:35 AM)Drake Wrote: Well seeing as the Tannery has already cleared out an inventory of historic buildings for parking, the city should have insisted the developer replace those buildings with a parkade of similar or complementary design of the Tannery building(s). The lot they have 'created' isn't even paved and it looks like hell.
Parking garages are expensive enough that it could have have affected the financial feasibility of the Tannery in the first place, though I would have liked to see that conversation. At any rate, it is what it is. The question is how do we make the best of what we have.