09-29-2016, 12:57 PM
(09-29-2016, 11:40 AM)MidTowner Wrote:(09-29-2016, 11:25 AM)tomh009 Wrote: So it is still useful, then? But it would be better if it connected across to the other side King St? Do I understand your post correctly?
Is which still useful? The 4 or the 28? Both are probably useful for some people. I think the 4 would be a lot more useful as a crosstown route, offering connection to the GRH station as proposed.
You asked "Why would Midtowners prefer to take the bus to Lancaster, rather than connecting with the LRT?" It's not a choice between the two. I don't understand why the 4 would terminate at GRH instead of continuing east (similar to how it does now, or ideally even further).
Your answer implied that none of the changes are useful at all, and the routes are just as bad as before, from a midtown perspective. And what I'm hearing from your replies is that midtowners want to get to midtown on the other side of King, or to Lancaster. But not to other places.