05-15-2016, 07:33 AM
(05-14-2016, 09:28 PM)MacBerry Wrote:(05-14-2016, 11:07 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Yes, this is yet another consultation that is going off the rails. Of course the Laurel Trail (which is a traffic route, not primarily a park walk) should continue to run by the direct route immediately parallel to the tracks. There can be no rational debate on this point.
Is the third option to have both trails and both meet at the creek crossing?
Sounds good to me. But it’s not given as an option in the study. If the study was clear that there will continue to be a trail along the tracks, and the discussion is whether that trail should double as the Promenade or if the Promenade should take a different route, I would have no problem with it.