05-03-2024, 10:09 AM
(05-02-2024, 06:37 PM)dtkmelissa Wrote: However, the Region's most recent official plan review makes no mention of this area, nor the need for additional employment lands outside what was already outlined in the review - so why the seemingly quick shift in plans? And the expropriation part still seems problematic in this scenario. If the Region had clearly made it known there was a need for more employment lands and were not relying on expropriation to obtain 'needed lands', I think I'd have a very different take on this issue.
And why the NDAs, which are really unusual at the regional level? That makes me think the provincial government was (and maybe still is) driving this initiative.