07-27-2022, 05:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-27-2022, 05:24 PM by cherrypark.)
I think you are both talking past each other. It's both true that a MUT integrated with the LRT path could have been better than this internationally renowned death trap by slip lane, while also true that there are still a number of better solutions possible - including ones that that would not require a new bridge - to improve cycling safety at an otherwise trivial decrease in the speed and service level at the vehicular traffic entry to the on-ramps.
We should be asking for more and better options than putting cycling infra in inconvenient and less effective places like a centre lane of an LRT line or paths that traverse a bunch of unconnected area (looking at the Victoria transit hub MUT...), but no doubt it would be better than the symbolic paint we have now.
We should be asking for more and better options than putting cycling infra in inconvenient and less effective places like a centre lane of an LRT line or paths that traverse a bunch of unconnected area (looking at the Victoria transit hub MUT...), but no doubt it would be better than the symbolic paint we have now.