Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GO Transit
(09-15-2021, 02:03 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Honestly, sometimes I really want to meet the people in charge of these decisions and ask them what they are thinking, because some of the decisions I see are just...stupid.

Don’t start reading Steve Munro’s website:

https://stevemunro.ca

He’s always pointing out Metrolinx absurdity. You’ll double facepalm even more often than you probably already do.
Reply


(09-15-2021, 02:57 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: The ONLY trips this makes sense are London -> KW and the timing is terrible there.

I couldn't find a schedule in the news articles or press releases. What time will the trains run?

But, yes, I agree that commuting to Kitchener (from London) makes a whole lot more sense than Toronto. And that would be the case even if the full trip took three hours rather than two.
Reply
Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.

Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.
Reply
The only thing that makes sense to me is that it's a precursor step to initiate corridor improvements, but that doesn't really make much sense to me either. Politically, it's seems a lot easier to spend $100 million improving an existing GO line than it is spending $100 million to implement a new line.
Reply
(09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.

Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.
Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.
Reply
(09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.

Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.

Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.

And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops.
Reply
(09-15-2021, 07:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote: Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.

And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops.
I need a morning train to London. It would be nice if one of those stopped here.
Reply


(09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.

Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.
Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.

The other VIA trains are on the main line, no?
Reply
(09-15-2021, 07:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote: Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.

And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops.

Most London-Toronto Via trains use the south mainline, via Brantford. Much better track quality makes for faster trips (the track length is the same). The one Via train that takes the north mainline through Kitchener is 3.5 hours to Union.
Reply
(09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.

Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.

Yes, as your edit says, the Via runs frequently from London....the GO proposal is 1 train each way per day...(possibly 2 in the morning and one in the evening, which makes even less sense to me, but that's a different source), so yeah, also much less service than Via.
Reply
(09-15-2021, 04:33 PM)jamincan Wrote: The only thing that makes sense to me is that it's a precursor step to initiate corridor improvements, but that doesn't really make much sense to me either. Politically, it's seems a lot easier to spend $100 million improving an existing GO line than it is spending $100 million to implement a new line.

If they wanted to do a precursor, they should implement service which makes sense and is useful.

While I have no evidence, it is believable that this is intended to fail, to provide evidence against implementing more transit.
Reply
(09-15-2021, 09:04 PM)taylortbb Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 07:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote: And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops.

Most London-Toronto Via trains use the south mainline, via Brantford. Much better track quality makes for faster trips (the track length is the same). The one Via train that takes the north mainline through Kitchener is 3.5 hours to Union.

Yes, this is correct, the Via train is faster because it takes a different route (a route which GO could have used..they already have lakeshore trains which is the route that the Via trains use--which is why it is believable this is intended to fail..more logical service is eminently possible).

In fact, the Via trail via Kitchener (there were 2 trains, pre-COVID....it's crazy how much we've lost as a result of COVID), actually makes all the same stops TO Guelph, then after Guelph skips Acton, Mount Pleasant, Bramalea, Etobicoke North, Weston, and Bloor, but stops in Georgetown, Brampton, and Malton, so Via actually makes most of the same stops as the GO train.
Reply
(09-15-2021, 09:22 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 04:33 PM)jamincan Wrote: The only thing that makes sense to me is that it's a precursor step to initiate corridor improvements, but that doesn't really make much sense to me either. Politically, it's seems a lot easier to spend $100 million improving an existing GO line than it is spending $100 million to implement a new line.

If they wanted to do a precursor, they should implement service which makes sense and is useful.

While I have no evidence, it is believable that this is intended to fail, to provide evidence against implementing more transit.

Or it's primarily intended to serve the Kitchener-London pax rather Toronto-London.
Reply


(09-15-2021, 10:05 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 09:22 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: If they wanted to do a precursor, they should implement service which makes sense and is useful.

While I have no evidence, it is believable that this is intended to fail, to provide evidence against implementing more transit.

Or it's primarily intended to serve the Kitchener-London pax rather Toronto-London.

If that were true the timetables would should reflect that. It should also be a two way service.

As far as I've heard neither of those are true.
Reply
(09-16-2021, 06:50 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(09-15-2021, 10:05 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Or it's primarily intended to serve the Kitchener-London pax rather Toronto-London.

If that were true the timetables would should reflect that. It should also be a two way service.

As far as I've heard neither of those are true.

What will the timetable look like? I have not been able to find it anywhere.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links