Posts: 4,414
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
191
(09-15-2021, 02:03 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Honestly, sometimes I really want to meet the people in charge of these decisions and ask them what they are thinking, because some of the decisions I see are just...stupid.
Don’t start reading Steve Munro’s website:
https://stevemunro.ca
He’s always pointing out Metrolinx absurdity. You’ll double facepalm even more often than you probably already do.
Posts: 10,515
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
(09-15-2021, 02:57 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: The ONLY trips this makes sense are London -> KW and the timing is terrible there.
I couldn't find a schedule in the news articles or press releases. What time will the trains run?
But, yes, I agree that commuting to Kitchener (from London) makes a whole lot more sense than Toronto. And that would be the case even if the full trip took three hours rather than two.
Posts: 4,059
Threads: 64
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
235
09-15-2021, 04:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-15-2021, 05:03 PM by ac3r.)
Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.
Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.
Posts: 2,004
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
125
The only thing that makes sense to me is that it's a precursor step to initiate corridor improvements, but that doesn't really make much sense to me either. Politically, it's seems a lot easier to spend $100 million improving an existing GO line than it is spending $100 million to implement a new line.
Posts: 1,413
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
114
(09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.
Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see. Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.
Posts: 10,515
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
(09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote: (09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.
Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.
Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.
And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops.
Posts: 1,413
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
114
(09-15-2021, 07:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote: Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.
And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops. I need a morning train to London. It would be nice if one of those stopped here.
Posts: 6,590
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
99
(09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote: (09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.
Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see. Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.
The other VIA trains are on the main line, no?
Posts: 1,552
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
137
(09-15-2021, 07:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (09-15-2021, 07:18 PM)Acitta Wrote: Between Kitchener and London, there is only one train a day each way. An evening train to London and a morning train to Kitchener. So there are 6 trains, but only one stops in Kitchener.
And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops.
Most London-Toronto Via trains use the south mainline, via Brantford. Much better track quality makes for faster trips (the track length is the same). The one Via train that takes the north mainline through Kitchener is 3.5 hours to Union.
Posts: 7,757
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
212
(09-15-2021, 04:17 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some of the discussion happening over on Twitter has pointed out that a VIA train from London to Toronto takes - on the worst days - 2.5 hours. I realize VIA doesn't run as frequent since it's not a commuter train service, but does Metrolinx really think this is a good idea? Get HSR going, not this stone age shit.
Edit: Apparently the VIA trains run 5 to 6 times a day, which is pretty decent. I imagine the GO trains won't run as often, but we'd have to see.
Yes, as your edit says, the Via runs frequently from London....the GO proposal is 1 train each way per day...(possibly 2 in the morning and one in the evening, which makes even less sense to me, but that's a different source), so yeah, also much less service than Via.
Posts: 7,757
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
212
(09-15-2021, 04:33 PM)jamincan Wrote: The only thing that makes sense to me is that it's a precursor step to initiate corridor improvements, but that doesn't really make much sense to me either. Politically, it's seems a lot easier to spend $100 million improving an existing GO line than it is spending $100 million to implement a new line.
If they wanted to do a precursor, they should implement service which makes sense and is useful.
While I have no evidence, it is believable that this is intended to fail, to provide evidence against implementing more transit.
Posts: 7,757
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
212
(09-15-2021, 09:04 PM)taylortbb Wrote: (09-15-2021, 07:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote: And that's why it's over an hour faster: no stops.
Most London-Toronto Via trains use the south mainline, via Brantford. Much better track quality makes for faster trips (the track length is the same). The one Via train that takes the north mainline through Kitchener is 3.5 hours to Union.
Yes, this is correct, the Via train is faster because it takes a different route (a route which GO could have used..they already have lakeshore trains which is the route that the Via trains use--which is why it is believable this is intended to fail..more logical service is eminently possible).
In fact, the Via trail via Kitchener (there were 2 trains, pre-COVID....it's crazy how much we've lost as a result of COVID), actually makes all the same stops TO Guelph, then after Guelph skips Acton, Mount Pleasant, Bramalea, Etobicoke North, Weston, and Bloor, but stops in Georgetown, Brampton, and Malton, so Via actually makes most of the same stops as the GO train.
Posts: 10,515
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
(09-15-2021, 09:22 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: (09-15-2021, 04:33 PM)jamincan Wrote: The only thing that makes sense to me is that it's a precursor step to initiate corridor improvements, but that doesn't really make much sense to me either. Politically, it's seems a lot easier to spend $100 million improving an existing GO line than it is spending $100 million to implement a new line.
If they wanted to do a precursor, they should implement service which makes sense and is useful.
While I have no evidence, it is believable that this is intended to fail, to provide evidence against implementing more transit.
Or it's primarily intended to serve the Kitchener-London pax rather Toronto-London.
Posts: 7,757
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
212
(09-15-2021, 10:05 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (09-15-2021, 09:22 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: If they wanted to do a precursor, they should implement service which makes sense and is useful.
While I have no evidence, it is believable that this is intended to fail, to provide evidence against implementing more transit.
Or it's primarily intended to serve the Kitchener-London pax rather Toronto-London.
If that were true the timetables would should reflect that. It should also be a two way service.
As far as I've heard neither of those are true.
Posts: 10,515
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
(09-16-2021, 06:50 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: (09-15-2021, 10:05 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Or it's primarily intended to serve the Kitchener-London pax rather Toronto-London.
If that were true the timetables would should reflect that. It should also be a two way service.
As far as I've heard neither of those are true.
What will the timetable look like? I have not been able to find it anywhere.
|