Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
What’s worse is the design on Northfield, and even further worse, the fully built-from-scratch Fairway Road Extension, which has a barrier... for the sidewalk. Cyclists are sandwiched between said barrier and 80 km/h limit (100 km/h actual) traffic.
Posts: 7,847
Threads: 37
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
218
12-18-2018, 10:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2018, 10:59 AM by danbrotherston.)
(12-18-2018, 10:28 AM)Canard Wrote: What’s worse is the design on Northfield, and even further worse, the fully built-from-scratch Fairway Road Extension, which has a barrier... for the sidewalk. Cyclists are sandwiched between said barrier and 80 km/h limit (100 km/h actual) traffic.
Exactly this!
And the Region's staff planned a similar design for Weber St, and I went to council to speak against it, the transportation commissioner explicitly testified that the design was fine and to the standard (it isn't). A short time later the design was changed, without any real admission that they made a mistake, but at least they're not going to build that dangerous shit.
The frustrating thing is we raised these exact same issues at ATAC and were ignored.
Posts: 608
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation:
79
Thanks for your advocacy Dan.
...K
Posts: 4,929
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
128
(12-18-2018, 10:59 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: (12-18-2018, 10:28 AM)Canard Wrote: What’s worse is the design on Northfield, and even further worse, the fully built-from-scratch Fairway Road Extension, which has a barrier... for the sidewalk. Cyclists are sandwiched between said barrier and 80 km/h limit (100 km/h actual) traffic.
Exactly this!
And the Region's staff planned a similar design for Weber St, and I went to council to speak against it, the transportation commissioner explicitly testified that the design was fine and to the standard (it isn't). A short time later the design was changed, without any real admission that they made a mistake, but at least they're not going to build that dangerous shit.
The frustrating thing is we raised these exact same issues at ATAC and were ignored.
Unfortunately I've heard this about many issues from many different people with regards to the ATAC. Sometimes I wonder if the committees they have exist to just look like there's a "process"
Posts: 1,206
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
37
Having been on the Waterloo committee, I found it was a lot of that. Plans would be shared, feedback gathered and mostly ignored. I couldn't rationalize spending my time on it.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Oh my god, haha - I just noticed a new detail with the Franklin St. Bridge MUT design that is going to make Dan scream (it’ll make all of us scream). It’s unreal. I have to get a photo....
Posts: 1,321
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
42
LOL, I can't wait to see it!
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Posts: 2,004
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
125
Posts: 4,529
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
139
Noticed tonight that the Ottawa to Grenville path has the lights turned on. It's still barricaded at either end, however.
Posts: 4,529
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
139
(01-04-2019, 12:36 AM)KevinL Wrote: Noticed tonight that the Ottawa to Grenville path has the lights turned on. It's still barricaded at either end, however.
In fact, one of them stayed on into today...
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Oh no!
Did you contact the project team?
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Posts: 4,529
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
139
Posts: 4,929
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
128
Yes!! Thanks Canard for drawing attention to this!
|