Posts: 141
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
2
06-21-2016, 08:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2016, 08:26 PM by JCnb.)
I don't think replacing the rail bridge is in the plans as previously mentioned, however the only likely scenario I see would be to build a single track span, demolish the old double track bridge followed by twinning the new bridge over the old alignment. This would provide a double track bridge offset by a track width which should be able to be accommodated at either end. This could also work nicely if the need for a third track comes about.
Rail Bridges need to be much stronger than a vihicular one therefore I can't see a temporary span working here.
Posts: 4,407
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
125
The fact it's currently a double track could work in their favour. They can temporarily restrict to one track, shore up under the closed track then swap, and that should allow the new underpasses to go in without a lot of hassle.
Posts: 4,407
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
125
08-18-2016, 03:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-18-2016, 03:23 PM by KevinL.)
Next phase was announced today - building the Wellington extension to eliminate the Shirley curve.
Interestingly, it looks like the Shirley name will not be used on the straight stretch here - the old curve that will now end in a cul-de-sac will stay Shirley, but those taking the straight road will transition directly from Wellington to Bingeman Centre.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Good! The last thing the Region needs is more fragmented road names for through roads!
Posts: 1,935
Threads: 102
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
18
From the CBC article on how Shirley Ave widening:
Approximately 160,400 vehicles travel Highway 7 every day.
I knew it was busy but didn't expect that volume of traffic.
Posts: 1,191
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
34
Is there still no public record of how much this project is costing?
Posts: 2,003
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
124
Wouldn't it make sense to switch the Shirley cul-de-sac so the entrance is on the other end for the final phase and thus eliminate one intersection from Bingeman Centre Drive?