Posts: 2,411
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
51
highlander, that marginal cost is relevant number to a discussion about you and your car , but not everyone. Still, the info's need, so thanks.
I guess what we could all agree on is that, for someone traveling for business, whose employer is reimbursing the distance, the CRA rate is of course the one to use.
Posts: 419
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
32
I love that highlander did a regression analysis before purchasing a vehicle. So nerdy!
To me it seemed that the purpose of the trip was to get views on YouTube. Pulling the stunt and doing the report were just means to that end that made for a compelling narrative for the target audience and enough creative reward to avoid having one's soul leak out one's ears from making another 'prank' video (or whatever cannibalizes views these days)
What is clear to me from this discussion is that costs and value differ so wildly person-to-person that broad statements on which is better will never be close to correct. The only thing we seen to be able to say with certainty is that driving can be unpleasant, the trains are slow and infrequent, and that the air fare is a lot of money.
And, really, that's about the same as saying that water is wet.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
12-21-2017, 12:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2017, 12:18 PM by Canard.)
Not having a car just isn’t an option for us. We road trip almost every weekend in the summer, and my family and friends are spread out across the province, mostly in rural areas. So, it’s there in the driveway regardless. So traveling with another mode is an additional cost, not an exchanged cost.
Posts: 10,516
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
Actually two cars, isn't it? Or am I mistaken?