02-11-2021, 10:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2021, 10:34 AM by danbrotherston.)
(02-11-2021, 10:05 AM)westwardloo Wrote:(02-11-2021, 09:10 AM)Watdot Wrote: A least it seems the complaining residents realize they are fighting a losing battle. Intensification will and must happen in the neighbourhood. With such close proximity to the LRT, this aligns with City growth plans. A reduction of parking is justified as a result of this fact. Perhaps underground/covered parking with a 5 storey building that has a wider foot print would be better received? It is unfortunate that surface parking remains to some degree.Looks like a nice quality infill project. Underground parking is my preferred option, but I think surface parking fits this site perfectly fine. The building is built along the street and hides the parking completely. I prefer that over having the parking take up the first floor and have some horrendous façade like DTK or one28.
Here is the Planning Justification Report for the project. https://www.waterloo.ca/en/government/re...report.pdf
Generally agree, it is a shame though, there could be a far larger, nicer ammenity space in behind.
The garage facades are generally quite ugly, but for a six storey building, a single underground parking level would easily be sufficient, more so with the reduced parking requirements, that could look something like these buildings on Ellen St.:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.4549223,-...384!8i8192
Even my building manages to get away with only two levels of underground parking for a 13 storey building.
Just another reason midrise development is better (at least when you aren't willing to entirely forego parking).