Posts: 1,227
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
31
08-09-2016, 02:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2016, 02:54 PM by BuildingScout.)
I fear that in the end, this initiative will simply slow down the construction of high raises, instead of achieving what it was meant to do, i.e. high raises of architectural high quality.
Additionally, it seems to me that the experience in the region is that as more and more high raises go up, the competition forces the builders to come up with better designs. If we look at Northdale the more recent buildings are far superior to the original King and Columbia high raises. Ditto for Trio on Belmont, 1 Victoria, City Centre, the Red, etc.
So maybe the best thing Kitchener could do is allow as many high raises to go up as they can, so builders forced to stand out to attract potential buyers.
Posts: 10,514
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
Why will it slow things down? It's a guideline, not a law or a regulation.
Posts: 744
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
13
(08-09-2016, 02:44 PM)BuildingScout Wrote: Additionally, it seems to me that the experience in the region is that as more and more high raises go up, the competition forces the builders to come up with better designs. If we look at Northdale the more recent buildings are far superior to the original King and Columbia high raises.
What I've heard about the more recent Northdale designs is that the design guidelines that Waterloo now has in place are playing a role.
Posts: 1,518
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
48
I'd also say that this is Kitchener's "Umpteenth time is a charm" moment. After decades of declining downtown employment as the factories closed, and various attempts to attract new activity to the Downtown, things are beginning (slowly) to look up. It will still take a while, and the unknown is how sustainable the current start-up boom is. The industrialists that created the factories 100+ years ago that are now being populated by start-ups no doubt thought that their industrial enterprises would be around forever too.
On a related note, the Detroit skyline is getting some TLC. The Book Tower and the David Stott Building are being renovated. From the article, "the tower, which looks like it’s straight out of Gotham City, will house a boutique hotel, offices, main street retail and apartments or condos." I would love if a local Urban Design Guideline included the line, "make it look like its straight out of Gotham City."
Posts: 10,514
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
(08-12-2016, 12:43 PM)nms Wrote: It will still take a while, and the unknown is how sustainable the current start-up boom is.
While there are a lot of startups in DTK, that's not all there is. Deloitte, D2L, EA, Google, NetSuite (Oracle) and Thompson Reuters, among others, are well beyond the startup phase.
Posts: 1,709
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
35
When we bring up the bad King experience in Waterloo, from University to Columbia, bear in mind that The BUDGie actually cements one of its main failings. Walking up King, the buildings are set so far back from the roadway and sidewalk that you feel vulnerable, stranded, and disconnected (albeit from buildings which largely don't seek your attention). In Kitchener, while we're pushing for ground floor activity, one of the guidelines as currently stands requires buildings to be set back by the podium height. So if you have a relatively innocuous four floor podium, your setback is now fairly massive, and you feel stranded just like in Waterloo.
Posts: 302
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
12
(08-15-2016, 02:43 PM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: When we bring up the bad King experience in Waterloo, from University to Columbia, bear in mind that The BUDGie actually cements one of its main failings. Walking up King, the buildings are set so far back from the roadway and sidewalk that you feel vulnerable, stranded, and disconnected (albeit from buildings which largely don't seek your attention). In Kitchener, while we're pushing for ground floor activity, one of the guidelines as currently stands requires buildings to be set back by the podium height. So if you have a relatively innocuous four floor podium, your setback is now fairly massive, and you feel stranded just like in Waterloo.
I have to say whenever I walk that stretch I never feel disconnected, stranded or vulnerable. I just walk.
Posts: 720
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
92
10-24-2016, 08:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2016, 08:51 PM by Lens.)
More progress: http://www.therecord.com/news-story/6928...100-years/
And an interesting bit of information, although these aren't necessarily all Downtown:
Quote:"But others argued that it makes sense to have the guidelines in place sooner, because Kitchener is already getting early proposals for a number of tall buildings. Developers have about half a dozen proposals for tall buildings at the pre-approval stage, and there's probably another half dozen in the early discussion stages, said planning director Alain Pinard."
Posts: 10,514
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
(10-24-2016, 08:51 PM)Lens Wrote: And an interesting bit of information, although these aren't necessarily all Downtown:
Quote:"But others argued that it makes sense to have the guidelines in place sooner, because Kitchener is already getting early proposals for a number of tall buildings. Developers have about half a dozen proposals for tall buildings at the pre-approval stage, and there's probably another half dozen in the early discussion stages, said planning director Alain Pinard."
Excellent -- even if not all of these will come to fruition. (The only ones I can think of at the moment are 100 Victoria and King's Crossing. And maybe the multi-modal as an early discussion.)
Posts: 1,096
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
58
I'd bet money one of them is the Duke / College property!
Posts: 6,589
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
98
10-25-2016, 08:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2016, 08:43 AM by panamaniac.)
Don't forget the mysterious project at Charles/Gaukel!
Posts: 395
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
9
10-25-2016, 08:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2016, 08:58 AM by Section ThirtyOne.)
Quote:"I think it's overdue," said Coun. Frank Etherington. "Get it done as soon as possible so that we're not caught short with … ugly, poorly constructed highrises. We've already got our share of those around the city."
Also like this quote. My city councillor doesn't mince words!
Posts: 4,927
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
127
(10-25-2016, 08:58 AM)Section ThirtyOne Wrote: Quote:"I think it's overdue," said Coun. Frank Etherington. "Get it done as soon as possible so that we're not caught short with … ugly, poorly constructed highrises. We've already got our share of those around the city."
Also like this quote. My city councillor doesn't mince words!
He's not wrong haha
Posts: 6,589
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
98
Has the City issued renders of what would/would not meet the new standards, or have things not yet progressed to that point?
Posts: 2,015
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
77
The final tall building urban design guidelines are going to Kitchener city council on December 4th and can be found here (page 10).
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.
|