Posts: 1,404
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
112
With so many development projects in the works and so many potential development sites, I don't think that there is any hurry to consider using the Rockaway Golf Course for development. The very large Metz project is not far from there, and there is yet to be any indication when they might put shovels in the ground.
Posts: 4,467
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
132
If the golf course goes away, I'd propose naturalizing much of it - rewilding the creek with meanders, removing the groomed lawns and planting native meadows, etc. Some parts of it could be developed into public facilities of some kind, too.
Posts: 4,402
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
189
(01-31-2023, 05:51 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (01-31-2023, 04:48 PM)bravado Wrote: I think there are reasonable points about golf as a use of public space:
1: long term decline in popularity
2: unusually inefficient use of space for a small number of people
3: high cost barrier of entry
4: not great for the environment, in general
Who knows what the future holds if private golf courses keep going away like the trend shows. Either way, I guess this isn’t related to 459 Mill St much…
I really should move this discussion ...
I don’t understand the graph. The number of participants in 2020 was 24.8K million or 24.8 billion people?
Posts: 1,404
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
112
(01-31-2023, 07:38 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: (01-31-2023, 05:51 PM)tomh009 Wrote: I really should move this discussion ...
I don’t understand the graph. The number of participants in 2020 was 24.8K million or 24.8 billion people?
https://www.zippia.com/advice/golf-industry-statistics/
Posts: 1,404
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
112
Posts: 4,402
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
189
(01-31-2023, 08:02 PM)Acitta Wrote: (01-31-2023, 07:38 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: I don’t understand the graph. The number of participants in 2020 was 24.8K million or 24.8 billion people?
https://www.zippia.com/advice/golf-industry-statistics/
Thanks for the link. The label on the axis says that it is in millions, then they put “K” next to the numbers. That makes no sense.
I suspect the “K”s simply shouldn’t be there. But I don’t know whether I should believe numbers (or anything else) from such a sloppy source. Maybe they should spend more time proofreading and less time on the links!
Posts: 6,570
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
96
02-01-2023, 10:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-01-2023, 10:03 AM by panamaniac.)
My musing really took this thread off-topic, for which I apologize. Perhaps we can agree that Rockway Golf Course is not going anywhere for now and move the discussion back to the proposed development on Mill St.
Posts: 195
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2020
Reputation:
9
COVID was a massive boon for golf. Where else could you get 4 hours of outdoor recreation and socially distanced human interaction? Golf is one of the few sports where you can play competitively well into your 70's. Personally, I probably I would have gone crazy or descended into alcoholism if I didn't have the opportunity leave my apartment and interact with other humans during the lockdowns. I know a bunch of seniors who may not have survived the pandemic without the exercise, fresh air and human interaction that is possible with golf.
Plus, there is a younger cohort of Gen-Z YouTube golfer content creators. On any given week, YouTube golf influencers get more views/impressions/comments/engagement than televised professional golf. "Good Good" has more than a million subs and gets hundreds of thousands of views per video.
I play twilights at Rockway or Doon pretty much once a week, and I see diverse groups of people including teens, women, people of colour, etc. Rockway isn't Deer Ridge or Westmount. You really don't have to be a wealthy old white person to enjoy golf. Not any more.
Anyway, let's hope this Mill St. development gets built. I would love to live near Rockway.
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 64
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
229
Does anyone know whether this is in Chapman's hood? Assuming she was re-elected. I can never remember the nuances of local politics. I don't want her to come out swinging with her usual NIMBY BS attacks given the density.
Posts: 659
Threads: 3
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
65
(02-19-2023, 02:28 PM)ac3r Wrote: Does anyone know whether this is in Chapman's hood? Assuming she was re-elected. I can never remember the nuances of local politics. I don't want her to come out swinging with her usual NIMBY BS attacks given the density.
Yep, Ward 9 goes to the highway.
Posts: 2,879
Threads: 3
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
98
(02-19-2023, 02:28 PM)ac3r Wrote: Does anyone know whether this is in Chapman's hood? Assuming she was re-elected. I can never remember the nuances of local politics. I don't want her to come out swinging with her usual NIMBY BS attacks given the density.
That would be awesome if it was Chapman's ward. Another project that will have to go to a tribunal of sorts to get off the ground, because Chapman hates progress.
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 64
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
229
(02-19-2023, 03:23 PM)cherrypark Wrote: Yep, Ward 9 goes to the highway.
Darn. Well as jeffster said, if it got denied it would likely end up going higher up (as Victoria and Park is in the process of doing) and then there's a good chance it will get approved since it would make Doug's developer buddies happy.
Posts: 800
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2021
Reputation:
140
There’s nothing that councillors hate more than adding new constituents
local cambridge weirdo
Posts: 659
Threads: 3
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
65
(02-19-2023, 04:23 PM)ac3r Wrote: (02-19-2023, 03:23 PM)cherrypark Wrote: Yep, Ward 9 goes to the highway.
Darn. Well as jeffster said, if it got denied it would likely end up going higher up (as Victoria and Park is in the process of doing) and then there's a good chance it will get approved since it would make Doug's developer buddies happy.
The OLT approvals always come out with more affordable and rental units right? Oh wait.
Posts: 1,404
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
112
The PARTS Rockaway Plan shows high density development around Mill Station, so I don't see this development being inconsistent with that. Bowing to NIMBYs in this case would not be a good look for council, it seems to me.
|