Posts: 10,514
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
I think this is excellent news. Auburn is very much committed to Kitchener-Waterloo, with Arrow Lofts and Barrel Yards already (mostly) complete, and Alexandra and Arrow 2 still left. This development will keep them busy until probably 2025 ...
Posts: 6,589
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
98
At least they are making the right noises:
""We are working on development concepts and have a vision for a range of housing forms and densities on the site along with some office, commercial space and parks."
One hopes for much more than a bigger Barrel Yards.
Posts: 616
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation:
22
(10-03-2017, 09:15 AM)tomh009 Wrote: I think this is excellent news. Auburn is very much committed to Kitchener-Waterloo, with Arrow Lofts and Barrel Yards already (mostly) complete, and Alexandra and Arrow 2 still left. This development will keep them busy until probably 2025 ...
Committed yes, but known for their bland, boring, and plain ugly architectural design choices (subjective, I know).
Posts: 10,514
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
(10-03-2017, 11:09 AM)urbd Wrote: (10-03-2017, 09:15 AM)tomh009 Wrote: I think this is excellent news. Auburn is very much committed to Kitchener-Waterloo, with Arrow Lofts and Barrel Yards already (mostly) complete, and Alexandra and Arrow 2 still left. This development will keep them busy until probably 2025 ...
Committed yes, but known for their bland, boring, and plain ugly architectural design choices (subjective, I know).
Are you referring to Arrow Lofts or to Barrel Yards? As far as I know there are only two local projects that they have built.
And apparently no non-bland, non-boring, non-plain-ugly design company was willing to purchase the Schneider's lands.
Posts: 6,589
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
98
Maybe we should start an "all brick, no stucco" campaign.
Posts: 434
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
57
(10-03-2017, 11:16 AM)panamaniac Wrote: Maybe we should start an "all brick, no stucco" campaign.
Actual stucco would be fine, but is no more likely to appear on a new building than actual brick.
Is there an formal name for pile-of-alternating-eifs-and-metal-clad-boxes vernacular?
Posts: 6,589
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
98
(10-03-2017, 11:32 AM)kps Wrote: (10-03-2017, 11:16 AM)panamaniac Wrote: Maybe we should start an "all brick, no stucco" campaign.
Actual stucco would be fine, but is no more likely to appear on a new building than actual brick.
Is there an formal name for pile-of-alternating-eifs-and-metal-clad-boxes vernacular?
Ugly? Garrish? Tacky? Likely to need recladding in 20 years?
Posts: 616
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation:
22
(10-03-2017, 11:13 AM)tomh009 Wrote: (10-03-2017, 11:09 AM)urbd Wrote: Committed yes, but known for their bland, boring, and plain ugly architectural design choices (subjective, I know).
Are you referring to Arrow Lofts or to Barrel Yards? As far as I know there are only two local projects that they have built.
And apparently no non-bland, non-boring, non-plain-ugly design company was willing to purchase the Schneider's lands.
Yes referring to those 2 and their many other projects in other cities, especially London. Either way, this will be a good redevelopment project, and we're slowly seeing more interesting architecture in the region.
Posts: 4,927
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
127
I actually think this is brutal. Auburn owns a ton of different properties in town and is doing nothing with them. Look how long Arrow Lofts took to get started. Barrelyards too. I worry that this won't start for like 10 years.
Posts: 62
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
1
(10-03-2017, 12:46 PM)Spokes Wrote: I actually think this is brutal. Auburn owns a ton of different properties in town and is doing nothing with them. Look how long Arrow Lofts took to get started. Barrelyards too. I worry that this won't start for like 10 years.
As opposed to the current owner doing nothing with it for 10 years?
Posts: 10,514
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
Posts: 226
Threads: 16
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
6
10-03-2017, 02:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2017, 02:39 PM by Watdot.)
Auburn has "half" completed the Barrel Yards. I'm not being critical of them but this Schneider's project will be a very long play for them. Whether they develop it or not, it's a good investment.
Posts: 10,514
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
332
Realistically project this big will take 2-3 years to get off the ground (planning, zoning, design, approvals etc) so by that time they should be wrapping up Barrel Yards.
Posts: 6,589
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
98
(10-03-2017, 12:46 PM)Spokes Wrote: I actually think this is brutal. Auburn owns a ton of different properties in town and is doing nothing with them. Look how long Arrow Lofts took to get started. Barrelyards too. I worry that this won't start for like 10 years.
I could see a row of towns or stacked towns going up along Borden very quickly - the demand would be strong, I suspect. But you are right, Auburn seems not to be in a hurry with their projects.
Posts: 1,779
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
148
(10-03-2017, 04:26 PM)panamaniac Wrote: (10-03-2017, 12:46 PM)Spokes Wrote: I actually think this is brutal. Auburn owns a ton of different properties in town and is doing nothing with them. Look how long Arrow Lofts took to get started. Barrelyards too. I worry that this won't start for like 10 years.
I could see a row of towns or stacked towns going up along Borden very quickly - the demand would be strong, I suspect. But you are right, Auburn seems not to be in a hurry with their projects.
I wonder if Auburn has the necessary Capitol to bring a project this size to fruition. They made need a partner.
|