(06-28-2019, 03:34 PM)tomh009 Wrote: I think that's just "artist's impression".
All too typical. For an illustration of a proposed development, I think they have a responsibility to actually make the drawing match up with what could actually be built. I don’t expect them to measure exactly where every overhead support pole is, but taking note of which roads and rails actually surround the site is well within reasonable expectations.
Are they really proposing to eliminate Charles St. in favour of an LRT-only route? That’s what is depicted in the pictures, with large buildings on the site of GRR.