04-17-2019, 05:41 PM
(04-17-2019, 03:07 PM)urbd Wrote:(04-17-2019, 02:37 PM)panamaniac Wrote: I would have thought that neighbourhood amenities like outdoor cafes, performance spaces, high-end retail and services go with those income levels/lifestyle preferences, but Barrel Yards seems devoid of same, unless you include Proof.
Barrelyards was designed as a luxury suburban community which happens to be in high rise buildings in the middle of the city. This is the problem when one developer buys a huge piece of land and develops it all by themselves, instead of severing and selling smaller pieces for smaller individual buildings that become part of the urban fabric. Keep in mind that what we see being built at the Barrelyards now is the product of a planning vision from 15 to 20 years ago when the city was trying to get someone to develop the land. Another problem with huge master planned developments - that the planning and construction world take so long that when the projects are finished they reflect a different era of design and urbanism.
Yes, I think that's pretty much it and why it has come to pass. My fear is that the Schneider lands redevelopment may be a comparable missed opportunity for similar reasons.