11-06-2017, 05:13 PM
(11-06-2017, 04:19 PM)Andy Wrote:(11-06-2017, 03:38 PM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: I am only slightly joking, but in situations like this, my question of clarification is always "which neighbourhood assotiation is it which will be leading the charge of opposition?"
MANA is the answer you're looking for. Also the property line will border the backyard for a number of single families on Moore. Not to mention all the single family homes sight lines of the Waterpark Place. I would expect traffic concerns from any homes on Tweed as well, since that would be the major access for westbound traffic.
5, maybe 7 homes on Moore Ave S. They all have deep backyards and the back of the structure will be 6 stories so based on the fact that this is a city I would consider opposition based on the very limited impact on 6 houses to be ill-considered.
I’m more concerned about traffic on Tweed. One possible fix might be to improve the corner of Laurel, Peppler, and Erb. If traffic turning left from Peppler/Laurel onto Erb and from Erb onto Peppler or Laurel didn’t have to cross, that intersection would work better and probably be safer. This is a case where I think traffic over a larger area needs to be considered, not just the intersection itself.