08-21-2017, 06:23 PM
(08-21-2017, 03:49 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(08-21-2017, 03:29 PM)Canard Wrote: LOL, but even if it was depreciated Kevin, imagine how many years it would have taken to grow over like that. 50? The trail has got to be like.. 5 years old, max. Here's the location, FYI.
https://goo.gl/maps/sXMJwL3ZB732
It’s the double standard again. No motor vehicle route can ever be subordinate to any bicycle route.
The road should simply have stop signs. In this case, this is just obvious, full stop (get it?).
In other locations, for example John St. at the Spur Line, I believe the road should in principle have stop signs and the trail should have priority, but I’m not sure how to actually construct the intersection so that vehicle drivers understand the situation and actually drive safely. The idea is that pedestrians and bicycles should just go across and it’s up to cars to fit into the gaps just as they do when reaching any major road.
Here's another painful example:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.4412166,-...312!8i6656
The trail has stop signs for the stub of a dead end road.