03-27-2017, 04:32 PM
(03-27-2017, 04:15 PM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: More expensive to run smaller sites, more expensive to create two entirely different building designs and build them, more expensive to provide sufficient parking and good transit connections separately, makes it harder to argue about add-on things (like food vendors, fitness centre) for a smaller overall facility.
But is that expense greater than, or worth, not having a central location? If multiple smaller central locations were possible, would that be better than a remote single location at the same cost?