02-04-2017, 02:19 PM
(02-04-2017, 07:39 AM)jamincan Wrote: This is also clearly not an example of NIMBYism. NIMBYism is a situation where the need and value is recognized, but the NIMBY doesn't want it in their neighbourhood because of perceived negative externalities. Halfway houses are the classic example. Arguing for a reduction in height, or lower FAR, or something like that is an argument over form, which is perfectly legitimate. Arguing that there isn't a need or no value is also perfectly legitimate. Keep in mind as well that NIMBYs may seem slightly hypocritical, but it's easy for people to self-righteously call someone else a NIMBY when their neighbourhood isn't the one being affected.
I actually think KW would be better served by more mid-rise development in the midtown area so that the density spreads over more of it rather than being concentrated in smaller nodes.
Ironically, there's a halfway house on Louisa Street. But you'd never know just by looking at it.