02-04-2016, 10:09 AM
(12-11-2015, 11:35 AM)Spokes Wrote:(12-10-2015, 11:19 PM)clasher Wrote: I would be in favour of demolishing most of it, the solid wall of brick facing courtland is particularly uninviting and makes for a rather dark street most of the time. There's not really any doors, windows or anything to interact with the street. Even though some of them are kind of old they are really bland red brick buildings. I also don't know what value there would be in saving any of the walkways or covered conveyors (I dunno what they are) and it would limit possibilities for building the site up.
Personally I'd get the first plans for the property at 83 Elmsdale (see this thread for pics) and tweak them to fit part of this site.
I'd love to see the creek opened up and re-naturalized... the city ought to take the opportunity to build a trail following Shoemaker creek all the way to Homer-Watson and connect it to the Iron Horse. I walked through the entire tunneled portion when I was in high school, there wasn't much of anything down there, we were hoping for a body or something exciting, lol.
Here's the google 3d view looking from a western view. Massive amount of opportunity for city building here. I hope it doesn't end up being too bland and banal.
It is indeed fairly uninviting, but i think there could be some serious push to restore an old industrial building. You can see where there used to be windows, maybe with them back in it could look good like Kaufman or Arrow.
Is it safe to assume the office building stays as is? I'd guess so.
This is weird, when I hit reply, no matter how I go to this thread, I'm always forced to have the above posts quoted in my reply.
Anyway, Consider that Waterloo was closed so that the intermodal hub could be the plot that it is today. If Palmer isn't deemed to be necessary to others outside of this site, or if alternatives are or are made available, it could become absorbed.