06-06-2025, 09:24 AM
This came up in my chaotic feed of urbanist stuff - what if Heritage designations had a review timeline? Isn't it odd that buildings get designated forever - what if they were required to be "renewed" every x years? It seems way too powerful to give local councils the authority to just permanently partition off parts of the city, and I think we are seeing that (Toronto especially) cities are designating land faster than they are building anything new.
local cambridge weirdo

