02-15-2024, 12:55 PM
This is starting to ugly. All sorts of misinformation being spread throughout the community on this one. Obviously GRR and the property owner have not communicated effectively with each other. There is no way this proposal starts demolition for another 5-10 years. Which is plenty of time for GRR to source an alternative location. It sucks for them to move twice in a decade, but if they wanted to control what is done with the property they should buy a location.
If I were the developer and was serious about this project moving forward I would consider eating the costs now and terminate the lease with GRR. I have a feeling like the City will side with the NIMBY's and the climbing community on this one because of how much of a fuss they are making. The good thing for GRR is I don't think the developer is serious about the project and is just looking for a rezone and flip.
If I were the developer and was serious about this project moving forward I would consider eating the costs now and terminate the lease with GRR. I have a feeling like the City will side with the NIMBY's and the climbing community on this one because of how much of a fuss they are making. The good thing for GRR is I don't think the developer is serious about the project and is just looking for a rezone and flip.