This was not approved tonight at the Planning and Strategic Council meeting. It is now being deferred to the next council meeting. The reasoning behind this is that there is some issues that are related to the regional airports flight path so NAV Can is involved, they are hoping this issue is resolved in time for next weeks meeting. Someone on here probably knows more in terms of the reasoning but this project is nowhere near the AZR of the airport so I can't see how the flight path of the airport is affecting it but it somehow is. TEK Tower didn't have any issues related to flight paths that I remember so this seems to be a rather peculiar situation and staff didn't elaborate on it. I could see 50 Borden having issues with the flight path considering it is right next to the AZR (maybe why it hasn't come to council yet) but this is definitely one of the more interesting reasons for a development to get a deferral.
Edit: I rewatched the section about the deferral and the following was said "staff are waiting on further information and details from NAV Can on potential impacts to the regional airport flight path." So there might not be issues, but considering staff haven't mentioned flight paths before makes it seem like there is some kind of issue.
Edit: I rewatched the section about the deferral and the following was said "staff are waiting on further information and details from NAV Can on potential impacts to the regional airport flight path." So there might not be issues, but considering staff haven't mentioned flight paths before makes it seem like there is some kind of issue.