12-17-2023, 10:44 PM
Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
Login or Create an Account
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
Login or Create an Account
Thread Rating:
General Suburban Updates and Rumours
|
12-17-2023, 10:49 PM
(12-16-2023, 06:15 PM)bravado Wrote: I was out and about driving in suburbia and almost caused a crash craning my neck to spot this beauty in the middle of a sea of shitty beige siding and SUVs that don't fit in driveways. On a similar theme, I give you 555 King St E in Kitchener. Not new, but I don't recall when it was built. Maybe 20 years ago?
12-18-2023, 09:40 AM
(12-17-2023, 10:49 PM)tomh009 Wrote: On a similar theme, I give you 555 King St E in Kitchener. Not new, but I don't recall when it was built. Maybe 20 years ago? Significantly better. Each set of stairs serves 4 units, and you don’t get rained on while trying to open the front door. The stairs really ought to be covered (shovelling snow off stairs should not be necessary) but much better than the other design. They don’t dominate the front of the building.
12-18-2023, 10:54 AM
(12-17-2023, 10:49 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(12-16-2023, 06:15 PM)bravado Wrote: I was out and about driving in suburbia and almost caused a crash craning my neck to spot this beauty in the middle of a sea of shitty beige siding and SUVs that don't fit in driveways. I've always wondered who had the foresight to build these units. We briefly looked at these units back in about 2012 or so, because they were visually appealing and in a central location, but I think they were a little out of our price range at that time. It's a shame that whoever developed them didn't build 20 more blocks just like it. (12-18-2023, 10:54 AM)SF22 Wrote:(12-17-2023, 10:49 PM)tomh009 Wrote: On a similar theme, I give you 555 King St E in Kitchener. Not new, but I don't recall when it was built. Maybe 20 years ago? One development I like is Victoria Commons development. It's not perfect and the architecture of it is just like any suburb but they managed to squeeze in nearly 200 contemporary rowhouses into an extremely small space in that one. They could have easily built them in actual continuous rows and fit more housing in, rather than like most townhouse or rowhouse blocks these days where they're always broken up into blocks of XX units but even in spite of that but even if you ignore that it's real cool that they even dared to do this project with that degree of density. Often these days when a developer does townhouses or rowhouses it's just a building or two and has an incredible amount of wasted space in the form of useless yards, driveways that don't need to be so long or wide or outright parking lots.
12-19-2023, 10:46 AM
(12-18-2023, 09:17 PM)ac3r Wrote:(12-18-2023, 10:54 AM)SF22 Wrote: I've always wondered who had the foresight to build these units. We briefly looked at these units back in about 2012 or so, because they were visually appealing and in a central location, but I think they were a little out of our price range at that time. It's a shame that whoever developed them didn't build 20 more blocks just like it. Victoria Commons is great for density and a bit of that European feel to housing, but geographically it's in kind of a desert. Giant Tiger is probably the closest store that you might use on a regular basis, and it's 500m away from the nearest home in that development, and a full kilometre for the folks living at Louisa/St Leger. Minimum 500m walk to Mei King/A1 Pizza on Victoria, but that stretch of Victoria is so unpleasant to walk on. No pedestrian connection to the southeast (Adam St), which always confused me. Nice and close to Breithaupt Centre though, which is nice. If, say, Victoria St between Margaret and Lancaster saw some redevelopment and the introduction of a variety of shops and restaurants, Victoria Commons would feel a lot more convenient.
12-19-2023, 11:37 PM
(12-19-2023, 10:46 AM)SF22 Wrote: No pedestrian connection to the southeast (Adam St), which always confused me. My recollection is that it was originally marketed as 5 Adam, but they couldn’t reach a deal with the New Apostolic Church to buy their overflow parking lot at the end of Adam St., nor to provide access. It’s obvious that it would be better for the City as a whole if Victoria Marie Ct. was an extension of Adam St. rather than being separate, especially with no pedestrian connection. I could also be quite wrong in my memory.
12-20-2023, 09:58 AM
(12-19-2023, 11:37 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(12-19-2023, 10:46 AM)SF22 Wrote: No pedestrian connection to the southeast (Adam St), which always confused me. That would certainly explain it. It's a shame, because it would certainly improve access to the #4 bus that runs down Margaret. I hope we see more willingness from private entities to string their properties together with pedestrian pathways to create internal networks within a single block.
01-24-2024, 04:36 PM
Three new housing developments proposed in Doon
Local residents claim that it is a sign of the apocalypse. (I might be exaggerating a bit).
01-25-2024, 08:30 AM
Complaining about townhouses and a 3 floor building...lol.
01-25-2024, 04:53 PM
Which ones of these are historic?</sarcasm>
02-05-2024, 04:14 PM
02-06-2024, 12:37 PM
New stacked townhouse development proposed for 135-161 Jackson St, Kitchener. This is just inside the highway ring, but I've added it to Suburban updates just because it's in a very residential area that's not particularly close to any current density.
This is currently one big house that is hidden in the middle of a block, behind all the surrounding houses. The house and its pond will be removed, as well as 5-ish surrounding homes, to make space for 120 units, most of which will be 2 bed+den. They are also including their own little playground for kids, so definitely encouraging families with one or two kids to live here. They will be three storeys tall plus basement units. Full reports are here: https://app2.kitchener.ca/AppDocs/OpenDa...701880.pdf
02-06-2024, 12:42 PM
(02-06-2024, 12:37 PM)SF22 Wrote: New stacked townhouse development proposed for 135-161 Jackson St, Kitchener. This is just inside the highway ring, but I've added it to Suburban updates just because it's in a very residential area that's not particularly close to any current density. I feel like the proposed stacked townhomes actually suit this neighbourhood better than a single gated mansion. It hurts to look at all that parking, but it seems like an easy win otherwise.
02-06-2024, 12:53 PM
(02-06-2024, 12:42 PM)the_conestoga_guy Wrote:(02-06-2024, 12:37 PM)SF22 Wrote: New stacked townhouse development proposed for 135-161 Jackson St, Kitchener. This is just inside the highway ring, but I've added it to Suburban updates just because it's in a very residential area that's not particularly close to any current density. Totally agree! Plus they're keeping some amount of the existing established trees, which is always good to see. It sounds like they're also incorporating indoor bike parking somewhere, so hopefully this neighbourhood sees an increase in bike facilities. I don't think there's much beyond the on-street 'separated' lanes on Ottawa and the Delta St MUT, both of which are nearly a kilometre away. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)