11-24-2021, 09:23 PM
(11-24-2021, 03:29 PM)tomh009 Wrote: A lot of the life lease buildings require at least one 50+ or 55+ resident. Targeted at retired people but technically not requiring that. I don't think those would generally meet the requirements of section 18. Maybe no one has just made an issue of it yet?
Yeah. I mean, it's only an issue if someone complains about it. It's not like I would complain about it.
(11-24-2021, 07:45 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(11-24-2021, 03:29 PM)tomh009 Wrote: A lot of the life lease buildings require at least one 50+ or 55+ resident. Targeted at retired people but technically not requiring that. I don't think those would generally meet the requirements of section 18. Maybe no one has just made an issue of it yet?
Not a lawyer here, but I do wonder if some of this is just a matter of nobody pushing hard on it. I understand that realtors will avoid showing 4 and 6 Willow (condo towers) to people with children, even though as far as I know the condo has no right at all to have any sort of “no children” rule. Not sure why buyers’ realtors would follow such a rule, but I don’t know the dynamics within the industry.
I think so. Over a decade ago we did visit a unit in the 4-6 Willow towers (wasn't right for us even if we had no children). Social pressures do operate.