ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - boatracer - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 02:57 PM)MidTowner Wrote: Another thread on reddit claimed that there was a ~40 minute delay to Ion as a result. Not good. I drove by it and there were 2 maintenance people under the front of the LRV removing the coupler cover. It then switched tracks and went back to the OMSF. Then there was another delay because the vehicle involved was sitting on the side of King north of Green when a GRT bus tried to make a left from Green to King and couldn't pass. So it stayed there while the now resuming LRV's had to wait for it to clear the tracks. During the time it took to clear the tracks a number of trains had to run opposite directions and I saw a 301R bus at one point. Needless to say it has been a busy day on the radio scanner. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 07-08-2019 Are there any other intersections with pedestrian crossings like King and Victoria on the route? It seems rather dangerous to put the beg buttons on the other side of the tracks. Apparently you still get a walk signal if someone on the other side of the road has pressed the button, which means pedestrians can cross the intersection on a walk signal and still be struck by a train if they don't check before crossing the tracks first. https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.4529056,-80.4983813,3a,88.3y,202.81h,73.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGAUDD5cDf_YnJZAQVzKPgQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 03:36 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Are there any other intersections with pedestrian crossings like King and Victoria on the route? It seems rather dangerous to put the beg buttons on the other side of the tracks. Apparently you still get a walk signal if someone on the other side of the road has pressed the button, which means pedestrians can cross the intersection on a walk signal and still be struck by a train if they don't check before crossing the tracks first. I'm fairly certain that is the only intersection where peds will get a walk signal to walk in front of the train. Honestly, I have no idea how that even happens, given the utter obsession with regulations (not safety)...I guess there isn't a regulation for that exact scenario, and thus nobody bothered thinking more than that.... Ooh...I'm being mighty cynical against our engineers today. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - taylortbb - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 03:36 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Are there any other intersections with pedestrian crossings like King and Victoria on the route? It seems rather dangerous to put the beg buttons on the other side of the tracks. Apparently you still get a walk signal if someone on the other side of the road has pressed the button, which means pedestrians can cross the intersection on a walk signal and still be struck by a train if they don't check before crossing the tracks first. I think it's the only one on the ION route, but far from the only one in the city. The ION is considered a slip lane there, which doesn't normally get crossing signals. Highland/Belmont is the same design, but with cars rather than LRVs. https://goo.gl/maps/4tcuTmrbsuzPa9iQ8 I believe cars are supposed to yield to pedestrians in a slip lane, I'd assume the same applies to LRVs? RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - JoeKW - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 03:36 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Are there any other intersections with pedestrian crossings like King and Victoria on the route? It seems rather dangerous to put the beg buttons on the other side of the tracks. Apparently you still get a walk signal if someone on the other side of the road has pressed the button, which means pedestrians can cross the intersection on a walk signal and still be struck by a train if they don't check before crossing the tracks first. Woops! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 03:36 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Are there any other intersections with pedestrian crossings like King and Victoria on the route? It seems rather dangerous to put the beg buttons on the other side of the tracks. Apparently you still get a walk signal if someone on the other side of the road has pressed the button, which means pedestrians can cross the intersection on a walk signal and still be struck by a train if they don't check before crossing the tracks first. There are other places where there is an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing of the LRT. For example, Willis Way just north of Father David Bauer. However, at King and Victoria, the uncontrolled crossings look like they are controlled by traffic lights even though they are not. This is dangerous. It’s not even clear to me who is supposed to have the right of way. It’s not a signalized pedestrian crossover, so I think that means vehicles (presumably including the LRT) have the right of way, but I’m not sure. Also interesting to look at these locations where the design involves pedestrians walking immediately next to the tracks and crossing when they judge it safe and consider the hysteria around the supposed dangers of crossing the tracks in the Traynor neighbourhood. I know they’re going faster there, but there is also excellent visibility. It’s a very strange inconsistency. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - CuilTard - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 04:14 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(07-08-2019, 03:36 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Are there any other intersections with pedestrian crossings like King and Victoria on the route? It seems rather dangerous to put the beg buttons on the other side of the tracks. Apparently you still get a walk signal if someone on the other side of the road has pressed the button, which means pedestrians can cross the intersection on a walk signal and still be struck by a train if they don't check before crossing the tracks first. Don't forget that for a train to be rounding this King/Victoria corner, it had to just stop at the southbound Central station. So to be unaware of a train you would have to walk past Central without seeing it, hearing it stop, open the doors and close them and whatever other assorted chimes it makes. IMO, no one should be crossing roads without checking just because the walk sign is on. The danger is no different than a car driver flooring a right turn without yielding when the walk sign is lit. or if a driver going the other way made a left as soon as they got a break in traffic without checking for pedestrians. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jwilliamson - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 05:19 PM)CuilTard Wrote: Don't forget that for a train to be rounding this King/Victoria corner, it had to just stop at the southbound Central station. So to be unaware of a train you would have to walk past Central without seeing it, hearing it stop, open the doors and close them and whatever other assorted chimes it makes. A pedestrian could have been walking along Victoria when they come to the intersection. I agree with the rest of your point, but they don't have to have walked by the station. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 07-08-2019 In a way it is like a slip lane, but in other ways it is not, in this case, you are walking directly towards a pedestrian crossing light, (which is quite possibly on walk), and there is no yield sign for the LRV. I suspect it is not terribly dangerous, the LRT operator has good visibility, and is traveling very slowly at the time. But it seems strange when you consider how obsessive the engineers appeared about safety, but it becomes clearer when you see that obsession is about regulations, not safety. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 06:07 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: … that obsession is about regulations, not safety. I think you’ve found the core of the issue. For LRT- and non-LRT-related design issues alike. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 01:49 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Both 511 and 512 have been hit by turning drivers so far today. More Info here: https://www.therecord.com/news-story/9492700-ion-trains-in-two-separate-crashes-on-monday/ Just a reminder of how bad the drivers in KW are. I was monitoring a 3-way stop down the street from where I live, not even an hour out there, but I counted to 500 vehicles (none bus and motorcycle): Of those cars, 390 didn't come to a complete stop. Of those 110 did stop, all but 5 had no other cars to compete. Of the 93 cars that had no cars to compete with, only 5 stopped. A total of 17 cruisers (police vehicles non-emergency) came to the 3-way stopped, only one actually slowed down to a crawl (not a complete stop), but the other 16 just 'yielded', 15 of those came when there was competing traffic. 3 ambulances came by, all stopped (this included 1 that stopped with no other cars in sight). One emergency vehicle came by, a fire truck, they stopped (as there were other vehicles). 3 City of Kitchener vehicles came by, they all stopped. The all 3 had "traffic", though 2 of those vehicles where turning right and had no competing traffic. Excluding from the above was 27 motorcyclists, only 2 of which slowed down and the rest just blew past the sign. There were 4 GRT busses, excluded from the totals, all stopped --- though for the one bus, it had to stop regardless as the bus stop is close to the stop sign. Of the 9 taxi's that came by, 1 stopped. My take on the issue then is simple. We're poor drivers. Police are the absolute worst drivers by far. And there is zero enforcement on this matter. And this is why we're seeing the accidents we're seeing. Not because of poor design, but because of bad habits, lack of enforcement, and the police themselves breaking the law 24/7 in non-emergency situations (city vehicles, GRT, and other EMS vehicles all obeyed the traffic signs). My totals: 531 vehicles (includes busses and motorcycles): Obedience rate: 21.4% (114/531) Vehicles (non-government/non-motorcyle): 21.6% (103/476) All EMS: 19% (4/21) All gov: 39.3% (11/28) All gov and EMS MINUS police: 100% (11/11) (City of Kitchener 3/3 and EMS 4/4, GRT 4/4) Police only: 0% (0/17) Motorcylists: 0% (0/27) (includes 3 police motorcycles) And, this is why we have issues. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 07-08-2019 RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 07:10 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Wow. I do have to point out that to my knowledge the poster of the video is incorrect in that Ontario is not a “timed stop” jurisdiction — all you have to do is stop, then proceed when it is safe and everybody who has right of way is out of the way. Also when there is truly nobody around (not other traffic, not pedestrians, nobody) I really don’t see any reason why a full stop is any better than almost stopping. But some parts of the video almost look like those photos of traffic in India where everybody just edges forward until the other traffic yields. The LRT problems, however, clearly stem from a pervasive ignoring of signals of all types. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - CuilTard - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 05:31 PM)jwilliamson Wrote:(07-08-2019, 05:19 PM)CuilTard Wrote: Don't forget that for a train to be rounding this King/Victoria corner, it had to just stop at the southbound Central station. So to be unaware of a train you would have to walk past Central without seeing it, hearing it stop, open the doors and close them and whatever other assorted chimes it makes. Good point. Thank you. I was basing my scenario on the reddit thread that (I assume) spawned this discussion in which the gentleman/woman was walking south. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 07-08-2019 (07-08-2019, 08:37 PM)CuilTard Wrote:(07-08-2019, 05:31 PM)jwilliamson Wrote: It's also the case that the operator will definitely see (and is looking for) pedestrians at this point, and has a gong, and a horn. I really don't feel this is actually terribly dangerous, but I do find it ironic and symbolic of our broken transportation engineering field. Edit: Upon reading the reddit thread, it's also clear that our right of way rules are entirely ambiguous and broken. I liked the Netherlands, where that type of thing has careful attention paid. Not only are there unambiguous pavement markings 100% of the time, the design of the roadway itself shows who has right of way. There are numerous places in our city where you have a sidewalk continue uninterrupted, yet there is a walk sign that in theory must be obeyed. Whoever built those (and there is a brand new one with the LRT) should lose their engineering degree.... Edit 2: Rules are an interesting question, the rules generally have a purpose, and if that purpose is being achieved, that is what is important, in my opinion. However, very often, there are people in our society who believe they know better than the rules, and often don't. Thus, they contradict the goal, while believing themselves to be in the right. The easy solution is to obey the rules all the time, and usually it's the right outcome (although there are plenty of rules which actually contradict their goal, both directly, and as a result of human factors). Drivers who crawl through a stop sign only bug me when they complain about cyclists doing the same thing. Drivers who intentionally endanger pedestrians for their own convenience are by far the bigger problem, just today a driver nearly ran my partner over while crossing in a marked crosswalk, on a green, there was no reason not to see the ped, the driver simply chose to force her to jump out of the way. This probably happens at least hourly at every busy intersection in the city, and nobody cares one iota. Yet we read continual blame for peds when they are hit. Okay, this took a bit of a tangent....sorry. |